Comparison Overview

RNET

VS

Silver Peak

RNET

no 75 , 4th floor , Negin building , West Sarv Blvd ,Tehran ,Iran., Tehran, tehran, undefined, IR
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://rnet.ir/

RNET is an Iranian leading provider of IT, network service support, communication and SONET solutions, with most connected IP networks. RNET Technology growth strategy is premised on making information and, where appropriate, education available to suppliers, staff and clients, so opportunities can be seized as they arise. Through developing strategic alliances with compatible businesses RNET intend to be a leader in the deployment and support of remote technology solutions.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Silver Peak

2860 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, 95050, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.silver-peak.com

Silver Peak helps enterprises and service providers flexibly and securely connect users to applications via the most cost-effective source of connectivity available. Silver Peak customers can quickly migrate to an enterprise-grade WAN that leverages the Internet (often referred to as SD-WAN), while dramatically improving application performance and lowering networking costs.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rnet.jpeg
RNET
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silver-peak-systems.jpeg
Silver Peak
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RNET
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Silver Peak
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RNET in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silver Peak in 2025.

Incident History — RNET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RNET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Silver Peak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silver Peak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rnet.jpeg
RNET
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silver-peak-systems.jpeg
Silver Peak
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RNET company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Silver Peak company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Silver Peak company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RNET company.

In the current year, Silver Peak company and RNET company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Silver Peak company nor RNET company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Silver Peak company nor RNET company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Silver Peak company nor RNET company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RNET company nor Silver Peak company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RNET nor Silver Peak holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RNET company nor Silver Peak company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Silver Peak company employs more people globally than RNET company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither RNET nor Silver Peak holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RNET nor Silver Peak holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RNET nor Silver Peak holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RNET nor Silver Peak holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RNET nor Silver Peak holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RNET nor Silver Peak holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References