Comparison Overview

RK Furniture

VS

OFITA

RK Furniture

95 Holyhead Road, Birmingham, B21 0HH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

A furniture business running into its 21st year of trading, RK Furniture is a small well trusted family run business, giving its customers quality and a large variety of furniture to choose from, ranging form classic to modern to funky unusual novelty furniture. Feel free to browse our website and if you don’t find anything you like, then contact us maybe we can source it for you. ecommerce, open source, shop, online shopping…

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OFITA

Pol. Ind. Betoño, c/ Escalmendi, 3., Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01013, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

About Us Nearly 50 years leading the design and equipment of workplaces. Hand in hand with architects and interior designers in common projects.   Ofita is a benchmark in the manufacture of furniture for workplaces, office desks, office chairs, desks and cabinets. In most projects, we personalize the furniture according to the needs of each company, corporate culture and working methods. When people work in comfortable environments they bring out their very best. We work to make people proud of their work environment. Our challenge is to create spaces inviting to excellence, respecting the person and the environment and with an Innovation Centre at the service of our clients and collaborators. With 50,000m2 of industrial installations and showrooms worldwide, our challenge is to create spaces which invite to excellence, respecting the person and the environment. We understand the specific needs of each business to offer customized solutions and we collaborate with the architect and interior designer to make your ideas come true.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rk-furniture.jpeg
RK Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ofita.jpeg
OFITA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RK Furniture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OFITA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RK Furniture in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OFITA in 2025.

Incident History — RK Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RK Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OFITA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OFITA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rk-furniture.jpeg
RK Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ofita.jpeg
OFITA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OFITA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RK Furniture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OFITA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RK Furniture company.

In the current year, OFITA company and RK Furniture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OFITA company nor RK Furniture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OFITA company nor RK Furniture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OFITA company nor RK Furniture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RK Furniture company nor OFITA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RK Furniture nor OFITA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RK Furniture company nor OFITA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OFITA company employs more people globally than RK Furniture company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither RK Furniture nor OFITA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RK Furniture nor OFITA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RK Furniture nor OFITA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RK Furniture nor OFITA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RK Furniture nor OFITA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RK Furniture nor OFITA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.