Comparison Overview

RJ Living

VS

two*

RJ Living

508-510 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC, 3121, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rjliving.com.au

Our homes are a living, conscious expression of who we are. The objects within them evoke an emotion, affecting the way we think and feel. At RJ Living, our mission is to help you furnish your home with unique, thoughtfully crafted pieces that bring your space to life. Beautiful designs. Unexpected details. The highest quality, ethically-sourced materials. Our range is sourced from leading global makers, a lovingly curated collection of styles from around the world. The people behind our products make this possible – a passionate and aware collaboration of individuals with a real belief in what we do. Everything we do has the personal touch. Our single purpose is to help you discover the right pieces to inspire your style of living. Nothing compares to seeing our collections in person at our Melbourne studio, and we warmly invite you to come in and see for yourself. Make a statement by design. Bring your space to life.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

two*

500 Davis Street, San Francisco, CA, 94111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.twofurnish.com

We’re two; a One Workplace venture. Two is built with the spirit of collaboration, two brings brands and cultures to life by creating smart furniture solutions for creatively minded companies. At two, we like to double down on fun, great design, and flawless execution. And we’ve assembled a team of experts who love what they do and know how to take a great design vision and bring it to life.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rjliving.jpeg
RJ Living
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RJ Living
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
two*
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RJ Living in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for two* in 2025.

Incident History — RJ Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RJ Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — two* (X = Date, Y = Severity)

two* cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rjliving.jpeg
RJ Living
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

two* company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RJ Living company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, two* company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RJ Living company.

In the current year, two* company and RJ Living company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither two* company nor RJ Living company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither two* company nor RJ Living company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither two* company nor RJ Living company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RJ Living company nor two* company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RJ Living nor two* holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RJ Living company nor two* company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

two* company employs more people globally than RJ Living company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither RJ Living nor two* holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RJ Living nor two* holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RJ Living nor two* holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RJ Living nor two* holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RJ Living nor two* holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RJ Living nor two* holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References