Comparison Overview

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP

VS

Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP

The Courtyard, Uckfield, TN22 1SL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Rix & Kay is a full service law firm with offices in Brighton & Hove, East Sussex, and Kent. We retain a strong regional presence across Sussex, Kent, Surrey and London and work in partnership with business owners, entrepreneurs and individuals, providing expert legal advice across a wide range of legal services. We also work in partnership with some of the most successful organisations in the UK both on national and international projects. Our mission is to ‘make law easy for you’ by providing legal services through dedicated, highly trained, teams that engage deeply with clients. Rix & Kay is recognised as a leading firm in the latest editions of The Legal 500 in multiple areas. We can claim significant sector expertise with our lawyers acting as Leaders in their Field. Please find all our current vacancies at: http://www.rixandkay.co.uk/careers/vacancies/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC

3300 N Central Ave, Phoenix, Arizona, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The family law attorneys Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC are known throughout Phoenix and the surrounding areas as committed, determined advocates. Paul Schmidt, Therese McElwee, and Tracy Gordon provide their clients with exceptional legal representation in all family law matters, including divorce, community property division, spousal maintenance, child support, prenuptial agreements, child custody, attorneys’ fees, modifications, and enforcement of previous court orders.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rix-&-kay-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jensen-and-gordon-pllc.jpeg
Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rix-&-kay-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jensen-and-gordon-pllc.jpeg
Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company.

In the current year, Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company and Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company nor Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company nor Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company nor Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP company employs more people globally than Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rix & Kay Solicitors LLP nor Schmidt McElwee & Gordon, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X