Comparison Overview

Riverwood Mental Health Services

VS

Medical Ancillary Services

Riverwood Mental Health Services

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Riverwood Mental Health Services has the goal to improve the quality of life for persons who experience significant and persistent behavioral health issues or chronic homelessness by providing and/or coordinating a range of residential and community based services that focus on recovery, wellness and personal growth. Riverwood has evolved from operating a single group home into a multi-faceted community service provider covering southeastern Rhode Island from Providence to Newport while providing a wide variety of behavioral health services. In 2006 Riverwood expanded it's mission and began providing services for individuals and families that were experiencing chronic homelessness. Riverwood's Vision - Established by The Riverwood Board of Directors: * We will be the agency that sets the benchmark for performance standards. * We will grow and expand our services without compromising our quality. * We will be the employer of choice in the field. * We will identify real community needs and provide services to meet them appropriate to our vision.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Medical Ancillary Services

85255, US
Last Update:

If your medical billing system is in chaos - or simply not doing its job - we can help. Our clients consider us a part of their team. We offer our equipment, software, knowledge, and the finest customer service to help you focus on what you do best ~ taking care of your patients. With Medical Ancillary Services you get account reimbursement that maximizes your income in the following ways: • Customized for your practice needs • Health insurance verification • Electronic claim submission • Primary and secondary insurance filing • Insurance payment posting • Follow up on insurance claims • Patient statements • Soft collection • Standard and customized reports • Staff training and platform setup • HIPAA compliant • Shared Scheduler It is our job to ~ ~ obtain reimbursement for the provider. We take our responsibilities very seriously and continuously further our knowledge. ~ electronically file claims to those carriers who accept electronic submission and drop to paper those claims that are filed with carriers who require manual submission. ~ work with your front desk to ascertain insurance verification for new and existing patients. ~ follow up up on claims submitted electronically and manually for status and disposition of the claims. ~ post and reconcile the EOBs and patient accounts, statements. ~ bill patients at month's end and follow up with 'soft' collection. ~ provide various practice forms to facilitate data transfer between our office and yours. ~ generate accounting practice reports at month's end.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverwood-mental-health-services.jpeg
Riverwood Mental Health Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-ancillary-services.jpeg
Medical Ancillary Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Riverwood Mental Health Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Medical Ancillary Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Riverwood Mental Health Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical Ancillary Services in 2026.

Incident History — Riverwood Mental Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Riverwood Mental Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Medical Ancillary Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical Ancillary Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverwood-mental-health-services.jpeg
Riverwood Mental Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-ancillary-services.jpeg
Medical Ancillary Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Medical Ancillary Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Riverwood Mental Health Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Medical Ancillary Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Riverwood Mental Health Services company.

In the current year, Medical Ancillary Services company and Riverwood Mental Health Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Medical Ancillary Services company nor Riverwood Mental Health Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Medical Ancillary Services company nor Riverwood Mental Health Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Medical Ancillary Services company nor Riverwood Mental Health Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services company nor Medical Ancillary Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services nor Medical Ancillary Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services company nor Medical Ancillary Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Medical Ancillary Services company employs more people globally than Riverwood Mental Health Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services nor Medical Ancillary Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services nor Medical Ancillary Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services nor Medical Ancillary Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services nor Medical Ancillary Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services nor Medical Ancillary Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Riverwood Mental Health Services nor Medical Ancillary Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N