Comparison Overview

Riverview Gardens, Inc.

VS

Transport for London

Riverview Gardens, Inc.

1101 S. Oneida Street, Appleton, WI, 54915, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://www.riverviewgardens.org

Excellent

Riverview Gardens is a financially self-sustaining social enterprise, focused on job training for people in need, using urban farming in a park-like setting in Appleton, WI. Our core concept is that all people have value and can contribute to the community where they live. We emphasize serving without judgment to: • empower people to build transferable work skills and strong work histories, allowing them to secure permanent employment and housing; • provide meaningful activity for socially isolated individuals; • make healthy food accessible; • change the community's perceptions of people in need through the creation of a thriving, highly interactive environment located in the center of our community. Founded in 1898, Riverview Country Club and golf course was Wisconsin’s oldest private country club and an Appleton institution until its closing in 2011. Riverview Gardens’ founders saw the beautiful, prominent property as an opportunity to address critical community needs in a completely new way, at the same time preserving and protecting the land for agricultural use. Riverview Gardens is the collaborative transformation of a 72-acre golf course and related country club. This transformation addresses serious regional challenges, including rising unemployment, homelessness, poverty, and lack of access to nutritious, fresh food, all with a financially self-sustaining model.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Transport for London

5 Endeavour Square, Westfield Avenue,, London , GB, E20 1JN
Last Update: 2025-09-18 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/about

Every day, we help millions of people to make journeys across London: By Tube, bus, tram, car, bike – and more. People don’t associate us with journeys by river, on foot or via the air, but we help with that, too. Getting people to where they need to go has been our business for over 100 years, and it shows. We’re leaders in our field, and no other city’s transport system is quite as recognisable: Red buses, black taxis, Tube trains and roundels have become icons in their own right. Our main job is to keep the city moving, working and growing but to do that, we have to listen. Constant improvements across the network are fuelled by feedback and comments from customers, as well as work within communities, representative groups, businesses and other London transport stakeholders. But our progress also depends on technology and data. With the future at our fingertips, we’ve already used it to revolutionise travel payments (think Oyster and contactless payment cards), and improved travel information. Tech and data is essential, not just to our future, but to others’: third parties use our data to power apps and services vital to customer journeys. So what’s next? As well as continuing to deliver Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan’s strategy and commitments on transport, our programme of capital investments is still one of the largest. We launched the Elizabeth line, we’re modernising services and stations and making travel safer for all.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18,194
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverview-gardens-inc-.jpeg
Riverview Gardens, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Riverview Gardens, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transport for London
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Riverview Gardens, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

Transport for London has 7.53% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Riverview Gardens, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Riverview Gardens, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transport for London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverview-gardens-inc-.jpeg
Riverview Gardens, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (likely), Network Intrusion, Exploitation of Vulnerabilities
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Disruption
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Riverview Gardens, Inc. company and Transport for London company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Transport for London company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Riverview Gardens, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Transport for London company has reported more cyber incidents than Riverview Gardens, Inc. company.

Neither Transport for London company nor Riverview Gardens, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Transport for London company nor Riverview Gardens, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Transport for London company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Riverview Gardens, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Riverview Gardens, Inc. company nor Transport for London company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Transport for London company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Riverview Gardens, Inc. company.

Transport for London company employs more people globally than Riverview Gardens, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
References
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
References
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Published
Date
2025-09-29
Updated
Date
2025-09-29
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References