Comparison Overview

Riverbed Partners

VS

FatPipe Networks

Riverbed Partners

680 Folsom Avenue, San Francisco, 94107, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://partners.riverbed.com

Riverbed is the only company with the collective richness of telemetry from network to app to end user, that illuminates and then accelerates every interaction, so organizations can deliver a seamless digital experience and drive enterprise performance. Our partners help us Empower the Experience fo rour joint customers.you have any comments, questions or concerns about the Riverbed partner program, please feel free to reach out to us through a direct message or at [email protected].

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

FatPipe Networks

392 E Winchester St, Salt Lake City, 84107, US
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fatpipeinc.com/

FatPipe®, the inventor and multiple patents holder of software-defined wide area networking (SD-WAN), reliability, security, and WAN Optimization products, specializes in providing solutions that transcend Wide Area Network (WAN) failures to maintain business continuity for thousands of customers including numerous Fortune 1000 customers over the last 15 years, and has the largest installed base of customers in software-defined network WANs.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 266
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverbed-partners.jpeg
Riverbed Partners
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fatpipe-networks.jpeg
FatPipe Networks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Riverbed Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FatPipe Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Riverbed Partners in 2026.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FatPipe Networks in 2026.

Incident History — Riverbed Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Riverbed Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FatPipe Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FatPipe Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverbed-partners.jpeg
Riverbed Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fatpipe-networks.jpeg
FatPipe Networks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Riverbed Partners company and FatPipe Networks company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, FatPipe Networks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Riverbed Partners company.

In the current year, FatPipe Networks company and Riverbed Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FatPipe Networks company nor Riverbed Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FatPipe Networks company nor Riverbed Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FatPipe Networks company nor Riverbed Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Riverbed Partners company nor FatPipe Networks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Riverbed Partners nor FatPipe Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Riverbed Partners company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FatPipe Networks company.

FatPipe Networks company employs more people globally than Riverbed Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Riverbed Partners nor FatPipe Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Riverbed Partners nor FatPipe Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Riverbed Partners nor FatPipe Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Riverbed Partners nor FatPipe Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Riverbed Partners nor FatPipe Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Riverbed Partners nor FatPipe Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References