Comparison Overview

River Rock Casino

VS

Pala Casino Spa and Resort

River Rock Casino

undefined, undefined, undefined, 95441, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Our mission is to provide a quality entertainment experience for every guest by delivering excellent customer service and product in a fun environment. We respect our relationships with each other, or visitors, our neighbors, and our community; and we acknowledge our actions reflect upon ourselves, and the Dry Creek Band of Pomo Indians and pledge to honor both.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 228
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pala Casino Spa and Resort

11154 Highway 76, Pala, 92059, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Pala Casino Spa & Resort includes a Las Vegas-style casino with 2,000 slot machines, 8-table poker room that hosts live play and championship tournaments and 87 table games; a 507-room hotel; a 10,000-square-foot, full-service spa and salon that features 14 treatment rooms; a state-of-the-art fitness center; swimming pool with 12 private poolside cabanas, and dual-temperature outdoor whirlpool. Pala also offers 10 restaurants and 40,000 square feet of meeting and convention space.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 749
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/river-rock-casino.jpeg
River Rock Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pala-casino-spa-and-resort.jpeg
Pala Casino Spa and Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
River Rock Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pala Casino Spa and Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for River Rock Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pala Casino Spa and Resort in 2025.

Incident History — River Rock Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

River Rock Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pala Casino Spa and Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pala Casino Spa and Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/river-rock-casino.jpeg
River Rock Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pala-casino-spa-and-resort.jpeg
Pala Casino Spa and Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pala Casino Spa and Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to River Rock Casino company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pala Casino Spa and Resort company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to River Rock Casino company.

In the current year, Pala Casino Spa and Resort company and River Rock Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pala Casino Spa and Resort company nor River Rock Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pala Casino Spa and Resort company nor River Rock Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pala Casino Spa and Resort company nor River Rock Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither River Rock Casino company nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither River Rock Casino nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither River Rock Casino company nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pala Casino Spa and Resort company employs more people globally than River Rock Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither River Rock Casino nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither River Rock Casino nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither River Rock Casino nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither River Rock Casino nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither River Rock Casino nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither River Rock Casino nor Pala Casino Spa and Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H