Comparison Overview

Ritchie Coatsworth Photography

VS

Vital Edit

Ritchie Coatsworth Photography

80 Hope Street, Crook, County Durham, DL159HT, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ritchiecoatsworthphotography.co.uk

We are a family friendly studio in Hope Street, Crook. We specialise in beautiful portraits of families, babies and children as well as wedding storytelling photography packages that capture all of your special moments for you to cherish for many years to come. We also undertake offsite corporate work working with various North East companies to help make their brand more engaging.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Vital Edit

undefined, San Diego, CA, 92129, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.VitalEdit.com

Vital Edit is a professional photo editing service crafted by photographers, for photographers. Understanding that each photographer possesses a unique style, Vital Edit offers personalized editing services that honor and enhance individual artistic visions.  Key Features: • Photographer-to-Photographer Editing: All editing is performed by experienced photographers who comprehend the nuances of capturing and refining images.  • Tailored to Your Style: Vital Edit collaborates closely with you to learn and replicate your distinct editing preferences, ensuring consistency across your portfolio.  • Comprehensive Services: From color correction and culling to retouching, Vital Edit provides a full spectrum of editing solutions to meet your specific needs.  • Fast Turnaround: Recognizing the importance of timely delivery, Vital Edit offers industry-leading turnaround times, with images returned in as little as 24 hours.  • Exceptional Customer Support: With a commitment to building lasting relationships, Vital Edit offers personalized service, ensuring your satisfaction at every step.  By entrusting your editing to Vital Edit, you can focus more on capturing moments, knowing that your post-processing is in expert hands that respect and enhance your unique photographic style.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ritchiecoatsworthphotography.jpeg
Ritchie Coatsworth Photography
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vital-edit.jpeg
Vital Edit
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ritchie Coatsworth Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vital Edit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ritchie Coatsworth Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vital Edit in 2025.

Incident History — Ritchie Coatsworth Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ritchie Coatsworth Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vital Edit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vital Edit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ritchiecoatsworthphotography.jpeg
Ritchie Coatsworth Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vital-edit.jpeg
Vital Edit
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vital Edit company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vital Edit company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company.

In the current year, Vital Edit company and Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vital Edit company nor Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vital Edit company nor Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vital Edit company nor Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company nor Vital Edit company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography nor Vital Edit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company nor Vital Edit company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vital Edit company employs more people globally than Ritchie Coatsworth Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography nor Vital Edit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography nor Vital Edit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography nor Vital Edit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography nor Vital Edit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography nor Vital Edit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ritchie Coatsworth Photography nor Vital Edit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References