Comparison Overview

Ritchey Logic

VS

Scuba.com

Ritchey Logic

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Performance Bicycle Components. We believe state of the art engineering is only useful when it delivers real benefit. Flashy products or the implementation of expensive materials or manufacturing have never been our end goal. That’s why “Logic” has always been the very best word to distinguish Tom’s sophisticated yet sensible approach to component design.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scuba.com

50 W 17th St, New York, NY, 10011, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Your one stop source for everything underwater. For over 30 years, Scuba.com is the number one destination for scuba diving and snorkeling gear from hundreds of brands. We offer a lowest price guarantee, plus free shipping on most items, and best-in-class customer service from diving experts. Shopping is available online at Scuba.com, via our phone team, or at our flagship dive shops in New York City and Southern California. Our NYC and Costa Mesa dive shops are PADI 5-Star Dive Centers, offering PADI certification classes for all experience levels and rental gear. Additionally, we are an authorized service center and fully equipped repair facility. Plus, join us on an upcoming curated dive trip!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ritchey-design.jpeg
Ritchey Logic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scuba.com.jpeg
Scuba.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ritchey Logic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scuba.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ritchey Logic in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scuba.com in 2025.

Incident History — Ritchey Logic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ritchey Logic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scuba.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scuba.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ritchey-design.jpeg
Ritchey Logic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scuba.com.jpeg
Scuba.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Scuba.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ritchey Logic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scuba.com company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ritchey Logic company.

In the current year, Scuba.com company and Ritchey Logic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scuba.com company nor Ritchey Logic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scuba.com company nor Ritchey Logic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scuba.com company nor Ritchey Logic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ritchey Logic company nor Scuba.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Scuba.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ritchey Logic company nor Scuba.com company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scuba.com company employs more people globally than Ritchey Logic company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Scuba.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Scuba.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Scuba.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Scuba.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Scuba.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ritchey Logic nor Scuba.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H