Comparison Overview

RiseWell Community Services

VS

Recovery In Tune

RiseWell Community Services

1 Farmingdale Rd, West Babylon, New York, US, 11704
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.risewell.org

RiseWell Community Services is an innovative multi-service, community-based social wellness agency. We are a major provider of health and wellness services, senior and children’s care, addiction recovery services, as well as affordable housing and support. RiseWell currently services Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Nassau County and Suffolk County. In collaboration with individuals, families, community leaders, and progressive healthcare providers, RiseWell serves as an agent of change in our reality of racial, economic, and cultural injustice. For over 50 years, we have been transforming lives, brightening futures, and strengthening the fabric of our community with a wide (and growing) array of services for high-need or economically deprived participants.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Recovery In Tune

6530 Griffin Road, Davie, 33314, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.recoveryintune.com

Recovery In Tune is a premium drug addiction treatment center located in Davie / Fort Lauderdale, Florida. We are a team of experienced and knowledgeable individuals in recovery. We understand the struggles of addiction and believe that each client deserves to be treated with compassion and acceptance. We strive to provide our clients with the necessary skills and the clinical understanding of their addictions to help prevent relapse and continue long-term sobriety. The RIT LinkedIn profile can be used to find more information about our treatment center and our available career opportunities.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/risewellcommunityservices.jpeg
RiseWell Community Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recovery-in-tune.jpeg
Recovery In Tune
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RiseWell Community Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Recovery In Tune
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RiseWell Community Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Recovery In Tune in 2026.

Incident History — RiseWell Community Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RiseWell Community Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Recovery In Tune (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Recovery In Tune cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/risewellcommunityservices.jpeg
RiseWell Community Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recovery-in-tune.jpeg
Recovery In Tune
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RiseWell Community Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Recovery In Tune company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Recovery In Tune company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RiseWell Community Services company.

In the current year, Recovery In Tune company and RiseWell Community Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Recovery In Tune company nor RiseWell Community Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Recovery In Tune company nor RiseWell Community Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Recovery In Tune company nor RiseWell Community Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RiseWell Community Services company nor Recovery In Tune company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RiseWell Community Services nor Recovery In Tune holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RiseWell Community Services company nor Recovery In Tune company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RiseWell Community Services company employs more people globally than Recovery In Tune company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither RiseWell Community Services nor Recovery In Tune holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RiseWell Community Services nor Recovery In Tune holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RiseWell Community Services nor Recovery In Tune holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RiseWell Community Services nor Recovery In Tune holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RiseWell Community Services nor Recovery In Tune holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RiseWell Community Services nor Recovery In Tune holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References