Comparison Overview

RISD Museum

VS

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art

RISD Museum

20 N Main St, Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.risdmuseum.org/

The RISD Museum believes that art, artists, and the institutions that support them play pivotal roles in promoting broad civic engagement and creating more open societies. Established in 1877 as part of a vibrant creative community, the RISD Museum stewards works of art representing diverse cultures from ancient times to the present. We interpret our collection with the focus on the maker and we deeply engage with art and artists, presenting ideas and perspectives that can be inspiring and complex. We aspire to create an accessible and inclusive environment that fosters meaningful relationships across all communities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art

200 W First St, Claremont, CA, 91711, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://clmoa.org

The Claremont Lewis Museum of Art, located in the historic Claremont Depot, is a jewel of a small art museum that celebrates the community’s rich artistic legacy and promotes the cultural vitality of the region. The Museum promotes the arts in Claremont and the region through its exhibitions and events and provides art education programs for Claremont schools. Centered by the Colleges, Claremont emerged as an important art community in the years following World War II under the leadership of Millard Sheets. Artists are integral to the cultural fabric of the City, having contributed to its unique identity and personality for more than 70 years. In the tradition of their predecessors, local artists continue to impact the quality of the social and built environments.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/risd-museum.jpeg
RISD Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claremont-museum-of-art.jpeg
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RISD Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RISD Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claremont Lewis Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — RISD Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RISD Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Claremont Lewis Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/risd-museum.jpeg
RISD Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claremont-museum-of-art.jpeg
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both RISD Museum company and Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RISD Museum company.

In the current year, Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company and RISD Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company nor RISD Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company nor RISD Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company nor RISD Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RISD Museum company nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RISD Museum nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RISD Museum company nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RISD Museum company employs more people globally than Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither RISD Museum nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RISD Museum nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RISD Museum nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RISD Museum nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RISD Museum nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RISD Museum nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References