Comparison Overview

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas

VS

L'Auberge Lake Charles

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas

3700 W Flamingo Rd, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Rio Hotel & Casino, part of the Destination by Hyatt brand, is a vibrant oasis just one block off the famed Las Vegas Strip on Flamingo Road. Boasting newly renovated 580 square-foot guest rooms, a new 3-acre pool paradise, an energetic 150,000 square-foot casino, unique food & beverage offerings, and a massive convention and meeting complex, Rio delivers the complete Las Vegas experience to our guests.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 317
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

L'Auberge Lake Charles

777 Avenue L'Auberge, None, Lake Charles, LA, US, 70601
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

L'Auberge is located on 242 acres of land in Lake Charles, La., two hours from the Houston metropolitan area. This premier facility is ideal for the business traveler or guest looking for the ultimate in hospitality and dining experiences, plus non-stop gaming action. The property includes a 26-story hotel complex with approximately 1,000 spacious rooms and suites; an 18-hole golf course designed by Tom Fazio; 26,000 gross square feet of meeting space, including a business center and conference registration area; two resort swimming pools, lazy river and private cabana courtyard; full-service salon and spa and cardio fitness center; retail stores; ten innovative dining outlets; and top-name entertainment. The casino features 30,000 square feet of Vegas-like gaming action with 62 table games and more than 1,600 ticket-in ticket-out slot machines.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 822
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riolasvegas.jpeg
Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l'auberge-du-lac.jpeg
L'Auberge Lake Charles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L'Auberge Lake Charles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L'Auberge Lake Charles in 2025.

Incident History — Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L'Auberge Lake Charles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L'Auberge Lake Charles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riolasvegas.jpeg
Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l'auberge-du-lac.jpeg
L'Auberge Lake Charles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

L'Auberge Lake Charles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, L'Auberge Lake Charles company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company.

In the current year, L'Auberge Lake Charles company and Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L'Auberge Lake Charles company nor Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L'Auberge Lake Charles company nor Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L'Auberge Lake Charles company nor Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company nor L'Auberge Lake Charles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor L'Auberge Lake Charles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

L'Auberge Lake Charles company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company.

L'Auberge Lake Charles company employs more people globally than Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor L'Auberge Lake Charles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor L'Auberge Lake Charles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor L'Auberge Lake Charles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor L'Auberge Lake Charles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor L'Auberge Lake Charles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor L'Auberge Lake Charles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H