Comparison Overview

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas

VS

Gaming Capital Group, LLC

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas

3700 W Flamingo Rd, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Rio Hotel & Casino, part of the Destination by Hyatt brand, is a vibrant oasis just one block off the famed Las Vegas Strip on Flamingo Road. Boasting newly renovated 580 square-foot guest rooms, a new 3-acre pool paradise, an energetic 150,000 square-foot casino, unique food & beverage offerings, and a massive convention and meeting complex, Rio delivers the complete Las Vegas experience to our guests.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 317
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gaming Capital Group, LLC

500 NW 32ND STREET, NEWCASTLE, OK, 73065, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Gaming Capital Group is a direct, flexible source of capital for the gaming industry. GCG provides equipment financing, as well as a wide array of financial services, to meet any and all gaming industry needs. In doing so, GCG encourages the development of new gaming projects, helps casinos adapt and thrive in an ever-changing financial environment, and supports the varied needs of an economically important and rapidly expanding industry. GCG continues to experience continued and significant growth. To date, GCG has provided over $1 billion of capital for equipment financing, including casino and hotel projects. We are one of the largest customers of gaming manufacturers, having purchased over 22,000 electronic gaming devices. Our customer base has expanded as well, with our team operating within 26 gaming jurisdictions and 128 casinos.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 151
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riolasvegas.jpeg
Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaming-capital-group.jpeg
Gaming Capital Group, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gaming Capital Group, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gaming Capital Group, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gaming Capital Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gaming Capital Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riolasvegas.jpeg
Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gaming-capital-group.jpeg
Gaming Capital Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gaming Capital Group, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gaming Capital Group, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company.

In the current year, Gaming Capital Group, LLC company and Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gaming Capital Group, LLC company nor Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gaming Capital Group, LLC company nor Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gaming Capital Group, LLC company nor Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas company employs more people globally than Gaming Capital Group, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rio Hotel & Casino Las Vegas nor Gaming Capital Group, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H