Comparison Overview

RIo Design

VS

EB Design

RIo Design

227 N Loop 1604 E, San Antonio, Texas, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Rio Design launches companies and their brands, products or services by creating targeted advertising, design and communication materials for print and web. We take a "client-aligned"​ approach to our work, and provide clients with a design team that becomes part of their company. We’re like an in-house, out-sourced, design department. Founded in 1994, Rio Design is an award-winning graphic design and branding identity studio located on the San Antonio River Walk. The studio designs and produces a range of communication materials including ads, annual reports, billboards, brochures, logos, environmental graphics, Flash videos, illustrations, photography, trade show graphics and websites. For more examples of our work, check out our website, RioDesign.com.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EB Design

6020 Westbourne Pl, Centreville, VA, 20120, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Graphic design firm that creates branding, collateral, logos, websites, multimedia presentations and animation, direct mail campaigns, exhibit graphics, print and electronic advertising and other marketing materials for a broad spectrum of clients. Excels at concept design, layout and photo manipulation and retouching; brand design and implementation to help clients effectively convey their targeted brand message across all marketing materials; managing and developing projects from conception to final production in print and electronic media; working with clients to meet their needs and build lasting relationships; and organizing projects to assure all deadlines are met.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rio-design.jpeg
RIo Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eb-design.jpeg
EB Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RIo Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EB Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RIo Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EB Design in 2025.

Incident History — RIo Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RIo Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EB Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EB Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rio-design.jpeg
RIo Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eb-design.jpeg
EB Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RIo Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EB Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EB Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RIo Design company.

In the current year, EB Design company and RIo Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EB Design company nor RIo Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EB Design company nor RIo Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EB Design company nor RIo Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RIo Design company nor EB Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RIo Design nor EB Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RIo Design company nor EB Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RIo Design company employs more people globally than EB Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither RIo Design nor EB Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RIo Design nor EB Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RIo Design nor EB Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RIo Design nor EB Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RIo Design nor EB Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RIo Design nor EB Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X