Comparison Overview

RingGo Parking

VS

CDW

RingGo Parking

Maplewood, Basingstoke, RG24 8YB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-30
Between 700 and 749

RingGo is part of Arrive, a leading global mobility platform built on over 70 years of innovation. Supporting nearly 60 million users in 90+ countries, Arrive brings together trusted brands to transform how people move through cities. Since 2005, RingGo has been helping millions of UK drivers save time and avoid hassle with simple, intuitive digital parking. With presence in 500+ towns and cities and 270+ operator partnerships, we’re trusted across the country. We make parking easier so cities can thrive. We build tech that gets noticed, for the right reasons. From high app ratings to industry awards and everyday praise for our Customer Care team, we’re proud of the experience we deliver. Together, we make cities more livable

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

CDW

200 N. Milwaukee Ave., Vernon Hills, IL, 60061, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At CDW, we know how to make technology work so people can do great things. Our experts bring a full-stack, full-lifestyle approach with custom solutions, services and relationships to bring your vision to life. Through decades of experience, scale, and deep industry expertise, we deliver the full promise of what technology can do to help you reach your goals and drive innovation. Partner with CDW, and together, let’s Make amazing happen. A Fortune 500 company and member of the S&P 500 Index, CDW helps its customers to navigate an increasingly complex IT market and maximize return on their technology investments. For more information about CDW, please visit www.CDW.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 17,869
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ringgo.jpeg
RingGo Parking
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdw.jpeg
CDW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RingGo Parking
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CDW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RingGo Parking in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDW in 2025.

Incident History — RingGo Parking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RingGo Parking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CDW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ringgo.jpeg
RingGo Parking
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unspecified
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdw.jpeg
CDW
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CDW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RingGo Parking company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

RingGo Parking company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CDW company has not reported any.

In the current year, CDW company and RingGo Parking company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CDW company nor RingGo Parking company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

RingGo Parking company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other CDW company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CDW company nor RingGo Parking company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RingGo Parking company nor CDW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RingGo Parking nor CDW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CDW company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RingGo Parking company.

CDW company employs more people globally than RingGo Parking company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither RingGo Parking nor CDW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RingGo Parking nor CDW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RingGo Parking nor CDW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RingGo Parking nor CDW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RingGo Parking nor CDW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RingGo Parking nor CDW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X