Comparison Overview

Ring

VS

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Ring

1523 26th Street, None, Santa Monica, California, US, 90404
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 650 and 699

Making Neighborhoods Safer

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 1,682
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas House , A Block, Chinchpokli, Mumbai, Mumbai - 400033, Mumbai, Maharastra, IN, 400033
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Voltas is the No. 1* Room Air Conditioner Brand in India. Apart from ACs, Voltas offers a wide range of cooling products including Air Coolers, Commercial Refrigeration, Water Coolers and Water Dispensers. Apart from being the leaders in consumer products, Voltas is also one of the world's premier engineering solutions providers and project specialists. We offer engineering solutions for a wide spectrum of industries such as heating, ventilation, air conditioning, refrigeration, electro-mechanical projects, water management, mining, construction & textile.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 13,165
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ring-labs.jpeg
Ring
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voltas-limited.jpeg
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ring
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Ring has 257.14% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise in 2025.

Incident History — Ring (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ring cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ring-labs.jpeg
Ring
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Backend Update Bug
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Software Vulnerability
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voltas-limited.jpeg
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ring company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ring company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ring company has reported more cyber incidents than Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company.

Neither Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company nor Ring company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Ring company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Ring company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ring company nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ring nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ring company.

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company employs more people globally than Ring company, reflecting its scale as a Computers and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither Ring nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ring nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ring nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ring nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ring nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ring nor Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H