Comparison Overview

Upland RightAnswers

VS

Thomson Reuters

Upland RightAnswers

401 Congress Ave, Austin, Texas, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
https://uplandsoftware.com/rightanswers/

Excellent

RightAnswers empowers service teams with AI-driven knowledge management. KCS v6 certified and tailored for complex enterprises, our solution accelerates troubleshooting and enhances customer support. With flexible AI options, pre-packaged content, and expert knowledge consulting, RightAnswers is the go-to partner for large B2B tech organizations seeking scalable, innovative knowledge solutions. Check out what others have to say about RightAnswers on G2: https://www.g2.com/products/rightanswers/reviews

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thomson Reuters

19 Duncan Street , Toronto, ON, M5H 3G6, CA
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
http://tr.com

Thomson Reuters is the world’s leading provider of news and information-based tools to professionals. Our worldwide network of journalists and specialist editors keep customers up to speed on global developments, with a particular focus on legal, regulatory and tax changes. Our customers operate in complex arenas that move society forward — tax, law, compliance, government, media. In a disruptive digital age, we help professionals reinvent themselves. Thomson Reuters shares are listed on the Toronto and New York Stock Exchanges (symbol: TRI).

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 35,141
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rightanswers.jpeg
Upland RightAnswers
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomson-reuters.jpeg
Thomson Reuters
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Upland RightAnswers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thomson Reuters
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Upland RightAnswers in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thomson Reuters in 2025.

Incident History — Upland RightAnswers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Upland RightAnswers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thomson Reuters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thomson Reuters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rightanswers.jpeg
Upland RightAnswers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomson-reuters.jpeg
Thomson Reuters
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unspecified Infiltration
Motivation: Retaliation for a cyber attack by Russia against Kyivstar
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Upland RightAnswers company and Thomson Reuters company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Thomson Reuters company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Upland RightAnswers company has not reported any.

In the current year, Thomson Reuters company and Upland RightAnswers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thomson Reuters company nor Upland RightAnswers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Thomson Reuters company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Upland RightAnswers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Thomson Reuters company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Upland RightAnswers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Upland RightAnswers company nor Thomson Reuters company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Thomson Reuters company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Upland RightAnswers company.

Thomson Reuters company employs more people globally than Upland RightAnswers company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References