Comparison Overview

Upland RightAnswers

VS

KPIT

Upland RightAnswers

401 Congress Ave, Austin, Texas, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)

Excellent

RightAnswers empowers service teams with AI-driven knowledge management. KCS v6 certified and tailored for complex enterprises, our solution accelerates troubleshooting and enhances customer support. With flexible AI options, pre-packaged content, and expert knowledge consulting, RightAnswers is the go-to partner for large B2B tech organizations seeking scalable, innovative knowledge solutions. Check out what others have to say about RightAnswers on G2: https://www.g2.com/products/rightanswers/reviews

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KPIT

SEZ Unit-2 , Plot no- 17, Pune, Maharashtra, 411057, IN
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

KPIT Technologies is a global partner to the automotive and mobility ecosystem for making software-defined vehicles a reality. It is a leading independent software development and integration partner helping mobility leapfrog towards a clean, smart, and safe future. With 11,000+ automobelievers across the globe specializing in embedded software, AI, and digital solutions, KPIT accelerates its clientsโ€™ implementation of next-generation technologies for the future mobility roadmap. With engineering centers in Europe, the USA, Japan, China, Thailand, and India, KPIT works with leaders in automotive and mobility and is present where the ecosystem is transforming.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 16,068
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rightanswers.jpeg
Upland RightAnswers
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpit.jpeg
KPIT
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Upland RightAnswers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KPIT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Upland RightAnswers in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPIT in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Upland RightAnswers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Upland RightAnswers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” KPIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rightanswers.jpeg
Upland RightAnswers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpit.jpeg
KPIT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Upland RightAnswers company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to KPIT company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KPIT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Upland RightAnswers company.

In the current year, KPIT company and Upland RightAnswers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KPIT company nor Upland RightAnswers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KPIT company nor Upland RightAnswers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KPIT company nor Upland RightAnswers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Upland RightAnswers company nor KPIT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Upland RightAnswers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KPIT company.

KPIT company employs more people globally than Upland RightAnswers company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.