Comparison Overview

Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra

VS

Studio Acting Conservatory

Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra

77 Danbury Road, Ridgefield, 06877, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ridgefieldsymphony.org

Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra is a professional orchestra with the mission to enrich the cultural life of the citizens of Ridgefield and surrounding communities by presenting musical performances of the highest artistic quality. The RSO also strives to increase the appreciation for music through active community involvement and innovative educational programs.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Studio Acting Conservatory

2031 10th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.studioactingconservatory.org

Studio Acting Conservatory unites a diverse community of like-minded individuals to unleash their full creative potential through quality, rigorous, and time-honored training. The Conservatory also serves as a bridge to the broader world of theater to maintain current and continued best-in-class training for the modern actor. Noted by Variety and Washingtonian Magazine, Studio Acting Conservatory is the premier training institution for actors and directors in Washington D.C. For over 40 years, 10,000 alumni have gone on to important theatre and film careers. The Conservatory is led by a 20-member faculty of committed professionals who teach 500 students— of every age and background—each year. The Conservatory also serves disadvantaged DC communities through a scholarship program that provides a theater curriculum for talented young people. Half of these students are on a full scholarship.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ridgefield-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-acting-conservatory.jpeg
Studio Acting Conservatory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio Acting Conservatory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio Acting Conservatory in 2025.

Incident History — Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio Acting Conservatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio Acting Conservatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ridgefield-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-acting-conservatory.jpeg
Studio Acting Conservatory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio Acting Conservatory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio Acting Conservatory company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company.

In the current year, Studio Acting Conservatory company and Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio Acting Conservatory company nor Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio Acting Conservatory company nor Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio Acting Conservatory company nor Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company nor Studio Acting Conservatory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra nor Studio Acting Conservatory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company nor Studio Acting Conservatory company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra company employs more people globally than Studio Acting Conservatory company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra nor Studio Acting Conservatory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra nor Studio Acting Conservatory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra nor Studio Acting Conservatory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra nor Studio Acting Conservatory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra nor Studio Acting Conservatory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ridgefield Symphony Orchestra nor Studio Acting Conservatory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References