Comparison Overview

Ricoh USA Graphic Communications

VS

GSP Print

Ricoh USA Graphic Communications

300 Eagleview Blvd, Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ricoh-usa.com/en/services-and-solutions/commercial-industrial-printing-services

Ricoh USA Graphic Communications is committed to helping you grow your business, improve customer engagement and increase operational efficiencies. -- We welcome discussion in the comments, however we reserve the right to delete or hide comments that contain profanity, offensive content, spam or advertising, or off-topic content. Do not post any personal information such as your email address or phone number.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

GSP Print

19 Ash Road, Prestons, NSW, 2170, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gspprint.com.au

GSP is Australia’s leading provider of high quality and cost-effective printing, finishing and logistics for point of sale, outdoor advertising and events campaigns. With over 51years of experience, no other large format printer can match us across the four major criteria of: • Quality – our experience ensures a superior product time and time again. • Turnaround time – we’ll meet your deadlines without compromising the quality. • Competitive pricing – and we always stick to your budget. • The latest technology – we use state-of-the-art equipment in our 5,000sqm purpose-built facility. GSP can produce your designs at incredible widths and unlimited lengths, handling the most challenging projects with ease. And it’s this, combined with our exceptional customer service, that makes GSP the perfect partner for your promotional needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ricohusagc.jpeg
Ricoh USA Graphic Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsp-print.jpeg
GSP Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ricoh USA Graphic Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GSP Print
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ricoh USA Graphic Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSP Print in 2025.

Incident History — Ricoh USA Graphic Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ricoh USA Graphic Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GSP Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSP Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ricohusagc.jpeg
Ricoh USA Graphic Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsp-print.jpeg
GSP Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GSP Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GSP Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company.

In the current year, GSP Print company and Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GSP Print company nor Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GSP Print company nor Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GSP Print company nor Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company nor GSP Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications nor GSP Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GSP Print company.

GSP Print company employs more people globally than Ricoh USA Graphic Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications nor GSP Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications nor GSP Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications nor GSP Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications nor GSP Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications nor GSP Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ricoh USA Graphic Communications nor GSP Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References