Comparison Overview

Ricoh USA, Inc.

VS

IBM

Ricoh USA, Inc.

300 Eagleview Blvd, Exton, PA, US, 19341
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

At Ricoh, we bring people, processes, and technology together to make information work for you. We unlock the power of information so organizations can unlock the full potential of their people. We're a leader in information management and digital services, creating competitive advantage for over 1.4 million businesses across the globe. Our team members serve a vast array of industries, using an innovative mix of people, processes, and technology to free trapped and hidden insights. We believe having access to the right information translates to better business agility, more human experiences, and the ability to thrive in today's age of hybrid and borderless work.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 18,122
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., New Orchard Road, Armonk, New York, NY, US, 10504
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

We don’t just imagine the future — we create it. We collaborate with technologists, developers and engineers to turn bold ideas into real-world impact. We partner with iconic brands like Ferrari and global events like the US Open, Wimbledon and The Masters to bring innovation to the world’s biggest stages and greatest fans. We work side-by-side with our clients, communities and even competitors to harness the power of AI, hybrid cloud and quantum computing — all to build a smarter, more efficient world. If you're fueled by curiosity and driven to make a difference, you'll feel right at home. Let’s create smarter business — together.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 332,876
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
10
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ricoh-company-ltd-.jpeg
Ricoh USA, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ricoh USA, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IBM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ricoh USA, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

IBM has 1685.71% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Ricoh USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ricoh USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ricoh-company-ltd-.jpeg
Ricoh USA, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing (Email), Vendor Scams, Credential Theft, Image-Based Phishing, Social Engineering
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ricoh USA, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IBM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IBM company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ricoh USA, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, IBM company has reported more cyber incidents than Ricoh USA, Inc. company.

Neither IBM company nor Ricoh USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

IBM company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Ricoh USA, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IBM company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Ricoh USA, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IBM company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Ricoh USA, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ricoh USA, Inc. nor IBM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IBM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ricoh USA, Inc. company.

IBM company employs more people globally than Ricoh USA, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Ricoh USA, Inc. nor IBM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ricoh USA, Inc. nor IBM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ricoh USA, Inc. nor IBM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ricoh USA, Inc. nor IBM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ricoh USA, Inc. nor IBM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ricoh USA, Inc. nor IBM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X