Comparison Overview

Richmond Community Schools

VS

Prince George's County Public Schools

Richmond Community Schools

US, 47374
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Local Public School System

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Prince George's County Public Schools

14201 School Lane, Upper Marlboro, MD, US, 20772
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 650 and 699

Prince George's County Public Schools (PGCPS), one of the nation's 25 largest school districts, has 200 schools and centers, more than 133,000 students and 22,000 employees. The school system serves a diverse student population from urban, suburban and rural communities located in the Washington, DC suburbs. PGCPS is nationally recognized for innovative programs and initiatives that provide students with unique learning opportunities, including arts integration, environmental and financial literacy, and language immersion.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 13,253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Richmond Community Schools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pgcps.jpeg
Prince George's County Public Schools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Richmond Community Schools
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prince George's County Public Schools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richmond Community Schools in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prince George's County Public Schools in 2025.

Incident History — Richmond Community Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richmond Community Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prince George's County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prince George's County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Richmond Community Schools
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2019
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pgcps.jpeg
Prince George's County Public Schools
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Richmond Community Schools company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prince George's County Public Schools company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Richmond Community Schools company.

In the current year, Prince George's County Public Schools company and Richmond Community Schools company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both Prince George's County Public Schools company and Richmond Community Schools company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Richmond Community Schools company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Prince George's County Public Schools company nor Richmond Community Schools company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Richmond Community Schools company nor Prince George's County Public Schools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Richmond Community Schools nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Richmond Community Schools company nor Prince George's County Public Schools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prince George's County Public Schools company employs more people globally than Richmond Community Schools company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither Richmond Community Schools nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Richmond Community Schools nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Richmond Community Schools nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Richmond Community Schools nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Richmond Community Schools nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Richmond Community Schools nor Prince George's County Public Schools holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N