Comparison Overview

Richmark Label

VS

JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division

Richmark Label

1110 E Pine St, Seattle, WA, 98122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Richmark Label is an award-winning label printer of high-quality custom labels, stickers and tape. * Water Bottle Labels * Wine Labels * Food Labels * Beer Labels The company's has ten quick-change flexographic (flexo) presses, capable of printing line or screen work from one to ten colors, and two large digital presses, capable of five colors. Printing includes product labels of many varieties: bottle labels, food labels (including for frozen food labels), water resistant labels, pouches and labels for flexible packaging. We print a variety of promotional style labels, coupons, ReseaLabels, liner and adhesive printed labels, imprintable labels (able to be printed upon by by thermal and other processes). We use standard commercial ink and UV ink as well as in-line and off-line hot foil stamping and embossing. Maximum label dimensions are 13 inches by 24 inches. Our delivery formats include roll labels, sheet labels and labels on fanfold sheets. We also print serialized labels (consecutively numbered labels) as well stickers and tape using all of the previously outlined capabilities. Richmark Label is a seventy-year-old corporation located in the Capitol Hill district of Seattle. With a 50,000 square foot facility working two shifts, Richmark prints over 300,000,000 (300 million) labels annually to serve the needs of customers in all fifty states and a number of other countries. Using a combination of expertise built over decades and plenty of old fashioned hard work, Richmark delivers great value and quality to its customers. Richmark is a registered trademark of The Richmark Company, a Washington corporation. The Richmark Company does business as Richmark Label. Toll Free: 800.456.8884 Email: [email protected] Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RichmarkLabel Twitter: https://twitter.com/RichmarkLabel

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division

410 LAWRENCE BELL DR, Buffalo, New York, 14221, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since 1981, JH Bertrand has been focused on making booklet label and related constructions that expand copy real estate on products. Our family of booklet label products include: Stitched and glue bound booklet labels, booklet labels for curved surfaces, extended content labels, foldout labels, mapfold booklet labels, encapsulated booklets on rolls, two and three ply labels, wrap around labels, paper, elastic and plastic neck hangers, coupon constructions, booklets with adhesive strips and patterned resealable adhesives. We use a variety of manufacturing methods including offset and marry, plowfold, re-registration of webs, pattern glue, zone coating, randomized variable coding, off press-on press combination processes and multi pass technologies. We have a dedicated clinical label division called Bertrand Clinical Label.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richmark-label.jpeg
Richmark Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jh-bertrand-inc.jpeg
JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Richmark Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richmark Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division in 2025.

Incident History — Richmark Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richmark Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richmark-label.jpeg
Richmark Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jh-bertrand-inc.jpeg
JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Richmark Label company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Richmark Label company.

In the current year, JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company and Richmark Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company nor Richmark Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company nor Richmark Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company nor Richmark Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Richmark Label company nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Richmark Label nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Richmark Label company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company.

Richmark Label company employs more people globally than JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Richmark Label nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Richmark Label nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Richmark Label nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Richmark Label nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Richmark Label nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Richmark Label nor JH Bertrand Inc & Bertrand Clinical Label Division holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N