Comparison Overview

Rich Feuer Anderson

VS

Compass Advocacy

Rich Feuer Anderson

1133 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://rfadc.com

Rich Feuer Anderson (RFA) is a distinguished bipartisan government affairs firm with over two decades of experience navigating Washington. Since our establishment in 2003, RFA has garnered national recognition for our expertise in crafting tailored advocacy strategies that help our clients achieve their goals. RFA stands out for our "whole-of-firm" approach to client engagement, ensuring that every client benefits from the full spectrum of our team's capabilities, substantive knowledge, and influential relationships across party lines. For those interested in retaining our advocacy or advisory services, please leave us a message here or contact us at [email protected].

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Compass Advocacy

48 Maryland Ave, Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.compassadvocacy.com/

Founded in 2018 by preeminent lobbyist Hannah Garagiola, Compass Advocacy is headquartered in the heart of Annapolis. In addition, we operate a government relations and law office in downtown Rockville, Maryland. We also advocate in Dover, Delaware. Our team is comprised of passionate lobbyists, consultants, creatives, attorneys, and problem-solvers ready to advocate for our clients. Compass Advocacy is comprised of three separate and distinct businesses to holistically navigate challenging client issues in the government relations, public relations, and the legal arena. Each business can work independently or synergistically to meet a client’s needs. Oftentimes, a client uses the services of all three businesses to accomplish their objectives. We work smartly, efficiently and with energy, passion, and dedication.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richfeueranderson.jpeg
Rich Feuer Anderson
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rich Feuer Anderson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Compass Advocacy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rich Feuer Anderson in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Advocacy in 2025.

Incident History — Rich Feuer Anderson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rich Feuer Anderson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Compass Advocacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Advocacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richfeueranderson.jpeg
Rich Feuer Anderson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Rich Feuer Anderson company and Compass Advocacy company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Compass Advocacy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rich Feuer Anderson company.

In the current year, Compass Advocacy company and Rich Feuer Anderson company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Rich Feuer Anderson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Rich Feuer Anderson company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Rich Feuer Anderson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Compass Advocacy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson company nor Compass Advocacy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rich Feuer Anderson company employs more people globally than Compass Advocacy company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Compass Advocacy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Compass Advocacy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Compass Advocacy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Compass Advocacy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Compass Advocacy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Compass Advocacy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References