Comparison Overview

Rich Feuer Anderson

VS

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development

Rich Feuer Anderson

1133 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Rich Feuer Anderson (RFA) is a distinguished bipartisan government affairs firm with over two decades of experience navigating Washington. Since our establishment in 2003, RFA has garnered national recognition for our expertise in crafting tailored advocacy strategies that help our clients achieve their goals. RFA stands out for our "whole-of-firm" approach to client engagement, ensuring that every client benefits from the full spectrum of our team's capabilities, substantive knowledge, and influential relationships across party lines. For those interested in retaining our advocacy or advisory services, please leave us a message here or contact us at [email protected].

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development

18501 Murdock Circle, Port Charlotte, 33948, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Your Business. Cleared for Takeoff. You can feel momentum in the air in Charlotte County, Florida. Things are happening. Just announced: A major partnership with one of America’s premier aviation colleges. Punta Gorda Airport recently completed a multi-million dollar expansion. The economic climate is as sunny as the weather and the landscape looks like a tropical paradise. With a pro-business attitude, leaders willing to invest in the community and fast track approvals, your business can be cleared for takeoff in no time. 4 Reasons Why Charlotte County is a Great Business Location: FAST TRACK APPROVALS TOP FLIGHT LOGISTICS LOWER LAND COSTS QUALITY OF WORK/LIFE View Charlotte County's Social Media Terms of Use at www.CharlotteCountyFL.gov/socialterms.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richfeueranderson.jpeg
Rich Feuer Anderson
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-county-economic-development-office.jpeg
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rich Feuer Anderson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rich Feuer Anderson in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development in 2025.

Incident History — Rich Feuer Anderson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rich Feuer Anderson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richfeueranderson.jpeg
Rich Feuer Anderson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-county-economic-development-office.jpeg
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rich Feuer Anderson company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rich Feuer Anderson company.

In the current year, Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company and Rich Feuer Anderson company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Rich Feuer Anderson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Rich Feuer Anderson company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Rich Feuer Anderson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson company nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson company nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rich Feuer Anderson company employs more people globally than Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rich Feuer Anderson nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N