Comparison Overview

Richards Label Co, Inc.

VS

Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee

Richards Label Co, Inc.

17291 Mount Herrmann, Fountain Valley, California, US, 92708
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://richardslabel.com/

Richards Label Company is your one-stop for printing solutions. While pressure sensitive labels are how we made our name in the industry, our commitment to expanding our capabilities has lead us to excellence in flexible packaging, tags, inserts, and a constantly expanding array of packaging innovations. Whether you are looking for upgraded packaging for your well-established product, or you are brand-new to the market and looking for a strong start, we can help you reach your goals. More than just a label vendor, Richards Label Company becomes a part of your team; working with you to find unique solutions and meet your company’s specific needs. Richards Label, Partnering in the success of your product since 1979.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee

2227 Southpark Drive, Murfreesboro, TN, 37128, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.FranklinsPrinting.org

Franklin's Printing-Middle Tennessee specializes in full color printing, including business cards, brochures, newsletters, letterhead, envelopes, and custom presentation folders. We have two on-site graphic designers, as well as a full-service mail department in-house that allows us to efficiently design, print, and mail your promotional piece to your customers and prospects. We're thankful to serve customers all over Middle Tennessee from our offices in Murfreesboro and Nashville.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richards-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Richards Label Co, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin's-printing-middle-tennessee.jpeg
Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Richards Label Co, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richards Label Co, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee in 2025.

Incident History — Richards Label Co, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richards Label Co, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richards-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Richards Label Co, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/franklin's-printing-middle-tennessee.jpeg
Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Richards Label Co, Inc. company and Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Richards Label Co, Inc. company.

In the current year, Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company and Richards Label Co, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company nor Richards Label Co, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company nor Richards Label Co, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company nor Richards Label Co, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. company nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Richards Label Co, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company.

Richards Label Co, Inc. company employs more people globally than Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. nor Franklin's PrintWorks-Middle Tennessee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References