Comparison Overview

Richard Hutchings Photography

VS

Pet Imagery

Richard Hutchings Photography

12572, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We are a full service photography company, specializing in children's publishing. My background in television production enables me to gather all the elements for our assignments from props to costumes, models, locations, etc. Our setting in New Rochelle, NY is 30 minutes from the city and allows us great natural resources of diverse families/schools/businesses to draw from.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pet Imagery

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Pet Imagery, by Lauren Kaplan, specializes in creative pet photography. Photo sesions are fun, laid-back and quite memorable! Lauren brings the shoot to you, in the comfort of your home or location of choice. The resulting imagery showcases your pet's true personality in a way that's present and real. Pet Imagery has been voted #1 Best Pet Photography by the Philly HOTlist (2012 & 2010) and was just recently voted Best Pet Specialty Services on the 2013 Philly Happening List.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Richard Hutchings Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pet-imagery.jpeg
Pet Imagery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Richard Hutchings Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pet Imagery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richard Hutchings Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pet Imagery in 2025.

Incident History — Richard Hutchings Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richard Hutchings Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pet Imagery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pet Imagery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Richard Hutchings Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pet-imagery.jpeg
Pet Imagery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Richard Hutchings Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pet Imagery company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pet Imagery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Richard Hutchings Photography company.

In the current year, Pet Imagery company and Richard Hutchings Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pet Imagery company nor Richard Hutchings Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pet Imagery company nor Richard Hutchings Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pet Imagery company nor Richard Hutchings Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography company nor Pet Imagery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography nor Pet Imagery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography company nor Pet Imagery company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Richard Hutchings Photography company employs more people globally than Pet Imagery company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography nor Pet Imagery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography nor Pet Imagery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography nor Pet Imagery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography nor Pet Imagery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography nor Pet Imagery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Richard Hutchings Photography nor Pet Imagery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N