Comparison Overview

Richard Booth Productions

VS

McCool Photography

Richard Booth Productions

West London, London, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10

We are a photography and production studio working worldwide in partnership with creative agencies to deliver stunning images and video that brings brands and campaigns alive. Our Director Richard Booth is one of the UK’s most talented photographers, with over twenty years international experience. Predominantly an advertising photographer and Director of Photography his portfolio is consequently diverse. From high status international clients to luxury brands, hoteliers to restaurateurs and healthcare to sport. All shot with an acute attention to detail and professionalism that has been duly recognised in the numerous awards he has received over recent years. Capturing visual art is the niche of Richard Booth Productions – whether in a still or moving image – a great level of care, precision and thought goes into every shot in order create images that are both thought provoking & energetic. Direct clients and advertising agencies alike benefit from our full pre-production service, project management and timely delivery of their creative brief. From the very start of the creative process Richard and his team work closely with clients to ensure the smooth running of the commission and can add expertise at any stage of the photographic production. There is no such thing as a typical shoot and as a team we are able to quickly and creatively adapt to whatever your individual project requires whether you need to find the perfect location, create CGI elements, book studios, hire or create props, manage model castings and selection to wardrobe, hair, make-up and styling. So, if you’re a creative agency looking to find a photography studio to partner with to deliver hi end content for your Global Brand Advertising, Consumer Campaigns, Product Launches, Leisure Experiences and Digital & Social Media Content, one that can help direct your campaign visually we would love to hear from you.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McCool Photography

Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

McCool Photography continues as a top source for the Equine Industry's photo needs. Because we are the 'Official Photographers' for so many top equestrian events each year, we have gained the reputation as 'the source' for delivering West Coast images. We are always striving to come up with fresh and artistic ways to represent the world's beloved horse.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richard-booth-productions.jpeg
Richard Booth Productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccool-photography.jpeg
McCool Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Richard Booth Productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McCool Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richard Booth Productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCool Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Richard Booth Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richard Booth Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McCool Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCool Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richard-booth-productions.jpeg
Richard Booth Productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccool-photography.jpeg
McCool Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Richard Booth Productions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McCool Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McCool Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Richard Booth Productions company.

In the current year, McCool Photography company and Richard Booth Productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McCool Photography company nor Richard Booth Productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McCool Photography company nor Richard Booth Productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McCool Photography company nor Richard Booth Productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Richard Booth Productions company nor McCool Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Richard Booth Productions nor McCool Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Richard Booth Productions company nor McCool Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Richard Booth Productions company employs more people globally than McCool Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Richard Booth Productions nor McCool Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Richard Booth Productions nor McCool Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Richard Booth Productions nor McCool Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Richard Booth Productions nor McCool Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Richard Booth Productions nor McCool Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Richard Booth Productions nor McCool Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N