Comparison Overview

Ricardo plc

VS

Bureau Veritas Group

Ricardo plc

None, None, London, None, GB, W2 6LA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Click the 'Follow' button and explore careers at Ricardo on our 'Jobs' and 'Life' tabs and at careers.ricardo.com. Ricardo plc is a world-class environmental, engineering and strategic consulting company listed on the London Stock Exchange. With more than 100 years of engineering excellence, we provide exceptional levels of technical expertise in delivering leading-edge and innovative cross-sector sustainable solutions to solve our clients’ most complex strategic and operational challenges.

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 2,955
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Bureau Veritas Group

4 Place des Saisons, Paris, Courbevoie, 92400, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bureau Veritas is a world leader in Testing, Inspection and Certification. Our mission is at the heart of key challenges: quality, health and safety, environmental protection and social responsibility. Through our wide range of expertise, impartiality and independence, we foster confidence between companies, public authorities and clients. Bureau Veritas is a Business to Business to Society company, contributing to transform the world we live in. Driven by society, we are working ever more closely with our clients, addressing today’s crucial challenges and answering society’s aspirations. Bureau Veritas is listed on the Euronext Paris (Compartment A, code ISIN FR 0006174348, stock symbol: BVI).

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 51,843
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ricardo-plc.jpeg
Ricardo plc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bureau-veritas-group.jpeg
Bureau Veritas Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ricardo plc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bureau Veritas Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ricardo plc in 2025.

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bureau Veritas Group in 2025.

Incident History — Ricardo plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ricardo plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bureau Veritas Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bureau Veritas Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ricardo-plc.jpeg
Ricardo plc
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bureau-veritas-group.jpeg
Bureau Veritas Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bureau Veritas Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ricardo plc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ricardo plc and Bureau Veritas Group have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Bureau Veritas Group company and Ricardo plc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bureau Veritas Group company nor Ricardo plc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Ricardo plc company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bureau Veritas Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Bureau Veritas Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Ricardo plc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ricardo plc company nor Bureau Veritas Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ricardo plc nor Bureau Veritas Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bureau Veritas Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ricardo plc company.

Bureau Veritas Group company employs more people globally than Ricardo plc company, reflecting its scale as a Environmental Services.

Neither Ricardo plc nor Bureau Veritas Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ricardo plc nor Bureau Veritas Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ricardo plc nor Bureau Veritas Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ricardo plc nor Bureau Veritas Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ricardo plc nor Bureau Veritas Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ricardo plc nor Bureau Veritas Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H