Comparison Overview

Rhode Island Historical Society

VS

South Bend Museum of Art

Rhode Island Historical Society

Aldrich House, Providence, RI 02906, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rihs.org

The Rhode Island Historical Society is a privately-endowed membership organization, founded in 1822, dedicated to collecting, preserving, and sharing Rhode Island’s history. The Society has the largest and most important historical collections in existence relating to Rhode Island . These collections include some 25,000 objects, 5,000 manuscripts, 100,000 books and printed items, 400,000 photographs and maps, and 9 million feet of motion-picture film. The Society owns and maintains the notable John Brown House ( 52 Power Street , Providence ), a National Historic Landmark built in 1786; the Aldrich House ( 110 Benevolent Street , Providence ), also a National Historic Landmark, built in 1822; and the Mary Elizabeth Robinson Research Center ( 121 Hope Street , Providence ). The Society also maintains the Museum of Work and Culture ( 42 South Main Street , Woonsocket ), a regional history museum devoted to the history of northern Rhode Island . The Society offers through the Newell D. Goff Education Center a variety of educational programs including workshops, lectures, films, and walking tours of Providence . The Society is very active in teacher training programs seeking to improve the quality of history teaching in Rhode Island schools. The Society also presents exhibits, films, concerts, and many other community activities and programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

South Bend Museum of Art

120 S. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, South Bend, IN, US, 46601
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.southbendart.org

Founded in 1947, the South Bend Museum of Art is the premier cultural destination for the community, providing insight into the art, history and culture of the region. SBMA celebrates 75 years in 2022, with a new outlook for growth, and a refreshed vision for the future. Conceived by a local teacher, Carlotta Banta in her bequest to the city, the South Bend Art Association was created through efforts of local leaders and originally established in the carriage house of the Studebaker mansion. The founding collection of works by Indiana artists was donated by Mr. and Mrs. E. M. Morris. In the early 1970s, the museum, the city, and the arts council combined efforts to create the new Century Center on the banks of the St. Joseph River in downtown South Bend. SBMA occupies 6000 square feet on three levels in the northern wing of the building. The reinvisioned SBMA was accredited in 1987 by the American Alliance of Museums; that accreditation was renewed in 1999 and 2011. SBMA is a world-class arts institution with deep roots in the community through exhibitions, programs, and studio arts classes. The brand identity tagline of See, Belong, Make, Art (SBMA) reinforces the museum’s commitment to displaying and creating art with inclusiveness and accessibility as cornerstones of its work. The collection is rich in regional art, from the nineteenth century to the present, and has long engaged with contemporary artists from Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Missouri. The museum puts on several major exhibitions every year. SBMA has fostered generations of emerging and established artists of all ages in it's art studios for ceramic, weaving, painting, photography and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhode-island-historical-society.jpeg
Rhode Island Historical Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-bend-museum-of-art.jpeg
South Bend Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rhode Island Historical Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Bend Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rhode Island Historical Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Bend Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Rhode Island Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rhode Island Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Bend Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Bend Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhode-island-historical-society.jpeg
Rhode Island Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-bend-museum-of-art.jpeg
South Bend Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

South Bend Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rhode Island Historical Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, South Bend Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rhode Island Historical Society company.

In the current year, South Bend Museum of Art company and Rhode Island Historical Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Rhode Island Historical Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Rhode Island Historical Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Bend Museum of Art company nor Rhode Island Historical Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society company nor South Bend Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society company nor South Bend Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rhode Island Historical Society company employs more people globally than South Bend Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rhode Island Historical Society nor South Bend Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References