Comparison Overview

Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers

VS

Legadex

Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers

115 East Second Street, Owensboro, Kentucky, 42302, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

In 1974, Jerry Rhoads started our law firm in Madisonville, Kentucky. Two years later, his brother Tom joined him, and they formed Rhoads & Rhoads P.S.C. The majority of their practice at the time focused on representing injured and disabled coal miners but grew into a full-service personal injury firm over time. Rhoads & Rhoads is now one of the largest personal injury firms in Western Kentucky, with two offices housing seven experienced attorneys and an outstanding staff. We have a reputation throughout Western Kentucky for being aggressive injury attorneys who get results. As testament to our successes, many of our clients come to us as referrals from former clients or other attorneys. Our attorneys are active in protecting the rights of people in the courtroom and in the legislature. Jerry Rhoads is the former president of the Kentucky Academy of Trial Attorneys (now Kentucky Justice Association) and currently serves in the Kentucky State Senate. Chris Rhoads currently serves as a district vice president and on the board of governors of the Kentucky Justice Association.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legadex

Antonio Vivaldistraat 64, Amsterdam, 1083 HP, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Legadex is your legal innovation partner with head office in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Legadex helps legal departments with advice, legal tech implementation and flexible staffing to handle their legal work in a more effective and efficient manner. Our team has a strong focus on smart work processes and has partnerships with many of the most innovative legal software providers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhoads-&-rhoads-injury-lawyers.jpeg
Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legadex.jpeg
Legadex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legadex
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legadex in 2025.

Incident History — Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legadex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legadex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhoads-&-rhoads-injury-lawyers.jpeg
Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legadex.jpeg
Legadex
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Legadex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legadex company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company.

In the current year, Legadex company and Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legadex company nor Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legadex company nor Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legadex company nor Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company nor Legadex company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers nor Legadex holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company nor Legadex company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Legadex company employs more people globally than Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers nor Legadex holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers nor Legadex holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers nor Legadex holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers nor Legadex holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers nor Legadex holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rhoads & Rhoads Injury Lawyers nor Legadex holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X