Comparison Overview

Rheinwerk Computing

VS

Oncotarget

Rheinwerk Computing

None, None, Boston, Massachusetts, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.rheinwerk-computing.com

Rheinwerk Computing is an imprint of Rheinwerk Publishing, which was founded in Bonn, Germany in 1999. The publications are written by leading experts in the fields of programming, administration, security, analytics, and more. Each book is detailed and hands-on to help readers develop essential practical skills that they can apply to their daily work. For more information on the Rheinwerk Computing series of books, please visit www.rheinwerk-computing.com.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Oncotarget

6666 East Quaker Street, 1A, Orchard Park, NY, US, 14127
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oncotarget.com

Oncotarget is a primarily oncology-focused, peer-reviewed, open access journal. Papers are published continuously within yearly volumes in their final and complete form and then quickly released to Pubmed. Oncotarget is indexed and archived by: PubMed MEDLINE PubMed Central Scopus EMBASE META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative; 2018-2022) Dimensions (Digital Science) Read about the Oncotarget Scientific Integrity Process: https://www.oncotarget.com/scientific_integrity/ Learn about our FREE Post-Publication Promotion Services: https://www.oncotarget.com/editorial-policies/#post-publication-promotion

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rheinwerk-computing.jpeg
Rheinwerk Computing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oncotarget.jpeg
Oncotarget
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rheinwerk Computing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oncotarget
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rheinwerk Computing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oncotarget in 2025.

Incident History — Rheinwerk Computing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rheinwerk Computing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oncotarget (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oncotarget cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rheinwerk-computing.jpeg
Rheinwerk Computing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oncotarget.jpeg
Oncotarget
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rheinwerk Computing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oncotarget company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oncotarget company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rheinwerk Computing company.

In the current year, Oncotarget company and Rheinwerk Computing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oncotarget company nor Rheinwerk Computing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oncotarget company nor Rheinwerk Computing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oncotarget company nor Rheinwerk Computing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing company nor Oncotarget company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing nor Oncotarget holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing company nor Oncotarget company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing nor Oncotarget holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing nor Oncotarget holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing nor Oncotarget holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing nor Oncotarget holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing nor Oncotarget holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing nor Oncotarget holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References