Comparison Overview

RGB Avocats

VS

Forte Tax & Law

RGB Avocats

Lima, Lima 33, PE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

RGB Avocats es un firma de abogados, domiciliado en Lima Perú, que brinda asesoría legal corporativa a inversionistas nacionales y extranjeros para que asegure el éxito de sus inversiones en el territorio peruano, independientemente de su modalidad: adquisición de acciones de una sociedad ya existente, compra de activos, creación de filiales o sucursales, licitaciones privadas o con el Estado, Asociaciones Público Privadas o contratos internacionales.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Forte Tax & Law

ul. Mayakovskogo 12A litera P, St Petersburg, Russia, RU, 191014
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Forte Tax & Law is a law firm that provides comprehensive legal support to international and Russian companies. We advise on a wide range of Russian law issues whilst conforming to high international standards. Being a Russian company, we also understand perfectly the particular nature of local situations and circumstances. We have offices in St. Petersburg and Moscow, and we represent the interests of our clients effectively and successfully throughout Russia. We specialize in tax, corporate, commercial and labor law. Our team consists of business-oriented professionals with exceptional knowledge gained in top universities as well as from over 10 years of experience in handling major projects for Russian and foreign clients. We focus on providing practical business solutions and clear risk management guidance, with a special emphasis on tax compliance and tax advice. We cooperate with leading law firms abroad to handle any international projects involving our clients based in the near and far abroad (Great Britain, Sweden, Turkey, Finland, Germany, Cyprus, CIS, etc.) Our expertise is recognized by leading ratings of law firms such as The Legal 500, International Tax Review, Best Lawyers, Pravo.ru-300, Kommersant, Forbes Club and Delovoy Petersburg.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rgb-avocats.jpeg
RGB Avocats
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forte-tax-and-law.jpeg
Forte Tax & Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RGB Avocats
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Forte Tax & Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RGB Avocats in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forte Tax & Law in 2025.

Incident History — RGB Avocats (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RGB Avocats cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Forte Tax & Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forte Tax & Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rgb-avocats.jpeg
RGB Avocats
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forte-tax-and-law.jpeg
Forte Tax & Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Forte Tax & Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RGB Avocats company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Forte Tax & Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RGB Avocats company.

In the current year, Forte Tax & Law company and RGB Avocats company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Forte Tax & Law company nor RGB Avocats company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Forte Tax & Law company nor RGB Avocats company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Forte Tax & Law company nor RGB Avocats company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RGB Avocats company nor Forte Tax & Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RGB Avocats nor Forte Tax & Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RGB Avocats company nor Forte Tax & Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Forte Tax & Law company employs more people globally than RGB Avocats company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither RGB Avocats nor Forte Tax & Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RGB Avocats nor Forte Tax & Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RGB Avocats nor Forte Tax & Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RGB Avocats nor Forte Tax & Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RGB Avocats nor Forte Tax & Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RGB Avocats nor Forte Tax & Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X