Comparison Overview

RFID Journal

VS

Bright Red Publishing

RFID Journal

P.O. Box 5874, Hauppauge, New York, 11788, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

RFID Journal was the world's first independent media company devoted solely to radio frequency identification and its many business applications. It is recognized as the world's leading source of RFID news and insights. Our mission is to help companies use RFID technologies to improve the way they do business. Learn more: www.rfidjournal.com and www.rfidjournalevents.com

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bright Red Publishing

1 Torphichen Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Bright Red offer the brightest and freshest Study Guides for Scotland’s students and teachers! At Bright Red we are passionate about producing accessible, contemporary and engaging materials of the highest quality for Scotland‘s students and teachers. One of the ways we achieve this high quality is to work with the very best publishing and educational professionals to produce truly exceptional resources.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rfid-journal.jpeg
RFID Journal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-red-publishing.jpeg
Bright Red Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RFID Journal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bright Red Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RFID Journal in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright Red Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — RFID Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RFID Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bright Red Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright Red Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rfid-journal.jpeg
RFID Journal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-red-publishing.jpeg
Bright Red Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both RFID Journal company and Bright Red Publishing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Bright Red Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RFID Journal company.

In the current year, Bright Red Publishing company and RFID Journal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor RFID Journal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor RFID Journal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor RFID Journal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RFID Journal company nor Bright Red Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RFID Journal nor Bright Red Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RFID Journal company nor Bright Red Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RFID Journal company employs more people globally than Bright Red Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither RFID Journal nor Bright Red Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RFID Journal nor Bright Red Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RFID Journal nor Bright Red Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RFID Journal nor Bright Red Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RFID Journal nor Bright Red Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RFID Journal nor Bright Red Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.