Comparison Overview

Reynolds DeWalt

VS

Artopix

Reynolds DeWalt

186 Duchaine Blvd, New Bedford, 02745, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Through Reynolds DeWalt’s role as a leader in marketing effectiveness, our clients enjoy measurable success that comes from uncompromised collaboration, unrivaled innovation, and reckless imagination™. Family owned and operated since 1948, Reynolds DeWalt provides a refreshing alternative, combining a history of innovation with a commitment to personal service and relationships.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Artopix

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Started in 1978 as Centre de la diapo a photographic lab . We are now in Digital printing, Fine Art scanning, Giclée printing, Rollup and Display printing and Graphic Design. We offer professional custom work with a personnal touch. Always trying to be up to date with new techniques.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reynolds-dewalt.jpeg
Reynolds DeWalt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artopix.jpeg
Artopix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reynolds DeWalt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Artopix
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reynolds DeWalt in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Artopix in 2025.

Incident History — Reynolds DeWalt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reynolds DeWalt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Artopix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Artopix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reynolds-dewalt.jpeg
Reynolds DeWalt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artopix.jpeg
Artopix
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Artopix company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reynolds DeWalt company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Artopix company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reynolds DeWalt company.

In the current year, Artopix company and Reynolds DeWalt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Artopix company nor Reynolds DeWalt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Artopix company nor Reynolds DeWalt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Artopix company nor Reynolds DeWalt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt company nor Artopix company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt nor Artopix holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt company nor Artopix company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reynolds DeWalt company employs more people globally than Artopix company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt nor Artopix holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt nor Artopix holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt nor Artopix holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt nor Artopix holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt nor Artopix holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reynolds DeWalt nor Artopix holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N