Comparison Overview

Revlegal LLC

VS

Law In Order Pty Ltd

Revlegal LLC

1650 W. Big Beaver Rd., Troy, MI, 48084, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We operate at warp-speed to help you strive. Revlegal, LLC is a legal consultancy firm with 20+ years of expertise in optimizing legal operations and a national footprint. Through our proprietary Revlegal Optimization Engine, we help corporate legal departments to: > Optimize Talent – Maximize the legal department’s value and talent > Streamline Routine – Utilize our optimization engine to increase efficiencies > Leverage Technology – Automate document and transactional driven processes Our services offered include: Lean process improvement Training for lawyers Contract management Legal document review Litigation support Ready to strive with Revlegal? Contact us at 248.502.1519 or [email protected]

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Law In Order Pty Ltd

Level 3, 123 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1999, Law In Order has become the leader in Bimodal Legal Support, providing scalable, end-to-end outsourced support services, including eDiscovery, eHearings and Document Solutions to the legal profession. We are unique in that we optimise your resources with our services so that you get more from less. We call this a “bimodal” approach and it helps enable winning outcomes on each and every case. Our expert services add real value to high volume document production, expert eDiscovery management and specialist court services, including virtual hearings. Our expertise in both traditional and modern technology-based services means we are a highly effective single-source provider for even the most complex of matters. With offices in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and India, our staff are experienced legal litigation support professionals 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 222
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/revlegal-llc.jpeg
Revlegal LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-in-order.jpeg
Law In Order Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Revlegal LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Law In Order Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Revlegal LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law In Order Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Revlegal LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Revlegal LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Law In Order Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law In Order Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/revlegal-llc.jpeg
Revlegal LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-in-order.jpeg
Law In Order Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Law In Order Pty Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Revlegal LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Law In Order Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Revlegal LLC company.

In the current year, Law In Order Pty Ltd company and Revlegal LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Law In Order Pty Ltd company nor Revlegal LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Law In Order Pty Ltd company nor Revlegal LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Law In Order Pty Ltd company nor Revlegal LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Revlegal LLC company nor Law In Order Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Revlegal LLC nor Law In Order Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Revlegal LLC company nor Law In Order Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law In Order Pty Ltd company employs more people globally than Revlegal LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Revlegal LLC nor Law In Order Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Revlegal LLC nor Law In Order Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Revlegal LLC nor Law In Order Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Revlegal LLC nor Law In Order Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Revlegal LLC nor Law In Order Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Revlegal LLC nor Law In Order Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X