Comparison Overview

Retail Council of Canada

VS

SITE

Retail Council of Canada

Toronto, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Retail Council of Canada (RCC) is a not-for-profit association representing small, mid, and large retail businesses in every community across the country. 𝗔𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹™ 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮, 𝘄𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝟱𝟰,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘀, 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘆, 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝘁𝘆, 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁, 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗿𝘀, 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀. RCC promotes and protects the retail industry through 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗰𝘆, 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, including: 𝗡𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 tailored to all aspects of the retail sector. Find out more: www.retailcouncil.org/events 𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 of retail industry headlines from across Canada and around the world. Subscribe today: www.retailcouncil.org/enews 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺𝘀 to support retailers in their various business functions. Learn more: www.retailcouncil.org/memberservices Interested in joining Retail Council of Canada’s community of retailers and industry supporters? 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗹.𝗼𝗿𝗴 to find out how you can become a member.

NAICS: 81391
NAICS Definition: Business Associations
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SITE

300 N. Wabash, Chicago, 60611, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

SITE is the only truly global business events association dedicated exclusively to incentive travel. Founded in 1973, we are a professional association of 3,500 members located in 87 countries, working in corporations, agencies, airlines, cruise companies, and across the entire destination supply chain. We bring value to our members at both global and local chapter level by networking, online resources, education, certification, and advocacy. SITE is deeply committed to the new generation and operates a best-in-class Young Leaders program and dedicated annual conference.

NAICS: 81391
NAICS Definition: Business Associations
Employees: 927
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/retailcouncil.jpeg
Retail Council of Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/site.jpeg
SITE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Retail Council of Canada
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SITE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industry Associations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Retail Council of Canada in 2025.

Incidents vs Industry Associations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SITE in 2025.

Incident History — Retail Council of Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Retail Council of Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SITE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SITE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/retailcouncil.jpeg
Retail Council of Canada
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/site.jpeg
SITE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SITE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Retail Council of Canada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SITE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Retail Council of Canada company.

In the current year, SITE company and Retail Council of Canada company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SITE company nor Retail Council of Canada company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SITE company nor Retail Council of Canada company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SITE company nor Retail Council of Canada company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Retail Council of Canada company nor SITE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Retail Council of Canada nor SITE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Retail Council of Canada company nor SITE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SITE company employs more people globally than Retail Council of Canada company, reflecting its scale as a Industry Associations.

Neither Retail Council of Canada nor SITE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Retail Council of Canada nor SITE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Retail Council of Canada nor SITE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Retail Council of Canada nor SITE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Retail Council of Canada nor SITE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Retail Council of Canada nor SITE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.