Comparison Overview

Restaurantes TOKS

VS

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers

Restaurantes TOKS

Avenida Ejército Nacional Piso 10 Granada, Ciudad de México 11520, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-26

El primer restaurante se abrió en el año 1971, somos más de 8,000 colaboradores distribuidos en más de 100 unidades de negocio a nivel nacional y un corporativo conformado por las áreas de: Recursos Humanos Jurídico Contraloría Sistemas Operaciones Producción Mercadotecnia Responsabilidad Social Construcción Estamos en un proceso de constante crecimiento, nos caracteriza la calidad de los productos que ofrecemos, nuestros principios y nuestro compromiso por México. Toks es mucho más.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers

6800 Bishop Rd, Plano, Texas, 75024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded by Todd Graves in 1996 in Baton Rouge, La., RAISING CANE'S CHICKEN FINGERS has over 800 restaurants in 41 states, with many new restaurants under construction. The company has ONE LOVE®—craveable chicken finger meals—and is continually recognized for its unique business model and customer satisfaction. RAISING CANE'S® vision is to grow restaurants, serving our Customers, all over the world and be the brand for craveable chicken finger meals, a great Crew, cool Culture, and Active Community Involvement.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 16,248
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restaurantes-toks.jpeg
Restaurantes TOKS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raising-cane's.jpeg
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Restaurantes TOKS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Restaurantes TOKS in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers in 2025.

Incident History — Restaurantes TOKS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Restaurantes TOKS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restaurantes-toks.jpeg
Restaurantes TOKS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raising-cane's.jpeg
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Restaurantes TOKS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Restaurantes TOKS company.

In the current year, Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company and Restaurantes TOKS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company nor Restaurantes TOKS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company nor Restaurantes TOKS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company nor Restaurantes TOKS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS company nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Restaurantes TOKS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company.

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers company employs more people globally than Restaurantes TOKS company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Restaurantes TOKS nor Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H