Comparison Overview

Resource Branding

VS

Noun Project

Resource Branding

80 West Wieuca Rd, Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Resource is a creative studio based in Atlanta. Since 1999, we’ve helped our clients strengthen communities and companies through brand development and experiential graphic design. Our greatest joy resides in building brands that bring people together and create a greater sense of place through delightful details and monumental moments, all grounded by a solid strategic foundation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Noun Project

Los Angeles, 90034, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Noun Project launched in 2011 to build a global visual language that unites the world - a language that allows quick and easy communication no matter who you are or where you are. Since then, our community of creators has built the most diverse and extensive collection of visual language in the world, used by nearly 10 million people. In 2016, the team behind Noun Project launched Lingo, a modern digital asset manager used by some of the world’s best-known brands including Target, Headspace, LinkedIn and Salesforce. We believe that visual language has the power to shape, reinforce, and change perceptions. Through initiatives like Iconathons, community design workshops, and the Redefining Women collection, we have been building the most extensive and diverse collection of icons ever created. To further support our vision, in 2020 we launched Noun Project Photos — a mission-driven, art-quality collection of photos celebrating diversity and representing a more inclusive world. Noun Project and Lingo are led by co-founders Sofya Polyakov and Edward Boatman. Based in Los Angeles, California, Noun Project has been recognized as one of the top 100 places to work in the city.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resource-branding-&-design.jpeg
Resource Branding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/noun-project.jpeg
Noun Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Resource Branding
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Noun Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Resource Branding in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Noun Project in 2025.

Incident History — Resource Branding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resource Branding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Noun Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Noun Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resource-branding-&-design.jpeg
Resource Branding
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/noun-project.jpeg
Noun Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Noun Project company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Resource Branding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Noun Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Resource Branding company.

In the current year, Noun Project company and Resource Branding company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Noun Project company nor Resource Branding company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Noun Project company nor Resource Branding company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Noun Project company nor Resource Branding company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Resource Branding company nor Noun Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Resource Branding nor Noun Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Resource Branding company nor Noun Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Noun Project company employs more people globally than Resource Branding company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Resource Branding nor Noun Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Resource Branding nor Noun Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Resource Branding nor Noun Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Resource Branding nor Noun Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Resource Branding nor Noun Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Resource Branding nor Noun Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X