Comparison Overview

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation

VS

National Cooperative Procurement Partners

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation

4558 Shetland Green Rd, Alexandria, VA, US, 22312
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

The Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation is a non-profit, public benefit 501(c)(3) educational and scientific charity. Much of the world depends upon satellite systems for precise navigation and timing services. These are exceptionally accurate and dependable, yet jamming, spoofing, and other forms of interference appear to be growing in frequency and severity. Neither are space systems immune to severe space weather or cyber-attack. This has the potential for devastating effects on our lives and economic activity. We promote multiple and resilient systems for balanced and healthy navigation and timing eco-systems, promote appropriate laws and enforcement to prevent GNSS jamming and spoofing, and educate leaders and the public about the importance of navigation and timing, existing vulnerabilities and the need for resilience. Learn More: https://rntfnd.org/ Become a Member: https://rntfnd.org/membership/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

National Cooperative Procurement Partners

4248 Park Glen Road, Minneapolis, 55416, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

NCPP is North America's Association for Public Procurement as it relates to Cooperative Purchasing. It's mission is to create educational and advocacy programs to drive best practices in public cooperative procurement, including transparency, competition, process integrity and auditability. The National Cooperative Procurement Partners is committed to working together to promote the highest level of business ethics, best practices, and standards to serve the procurement needs of government, education and non-profit agencies across the country. Learn more at NCPPAssociation.org

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-cooperative-procurement-partners.jpeg
National Cooperative Procurement Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Cooperative Procurement Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Cooperative Procurement Partners in 2025.

Incident History — Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Cooperative Procurement Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Cooperative Procurement Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resilient-navigation-and-timing-foundation.jpeg
Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: GPS Signal Manipulation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-cooperative-procurement-partners.jpeg
National Cooperative Procurement Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Cooperative Procurement Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas National Cooperative Procurement Partners company has not reported any.

In the current year, Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has reported more cyber incidents than National Cooperative Procurement Partners company.

Neither National Cooperative Procurement Partners company nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Cooperative Procurement Partners company nor Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while National Cooperative Procurement Partners company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Cooperative Procurement Partners company employs more people globally than Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation nor National Cooperative Procurement Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N