Comparison Overview

ResearchEd

VS

Center for Science in the Public Interest

ResearchEd

200 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, US, 20001
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.research-ed.org

ResearchEd is an education policy research group providing objective analysis, deep insights, and detailed recommendations for organizations seeking to support equitable student outcomes and promote community and economic development through education. At ResearchEd, we believe research is a tool to empower action, whether it be in the classroom, on campus, or in Congress. Our vision is to conduct work that increases equitable access to education as a catalyst for student and community success. Increasing and equalizing access to education is the first step in breaking down historic and ongoing structural barriers to racial and social justice, and to improving the well-being of all people. Check out www.research-ed.org to learn more.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Center for Science in the Public Interest

1250 I Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cspinet.org

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is a non-profit health-advocacy group based in Washington, DC, that focuses on nutrition and food safety. CSPI publishes Nutrition Action, one of the nation’s largest circulation health newsletter, and has led efforts that resulted in healthier diets, more-nutritious school foods, safer foods, and more honest food labeling. CSPI provides objective information to the public and represents citizens’ interests before legislative, regulatory, and judicial bodies. CSPI is supported largely by subscribers to Nutrition Action, individual donors, and foundation grants.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/researched.jpeg
ResearchEd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-science-in-the-public-interest.jpeg
Center for Science in the Public Interest
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ResearchEd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Science in the Public Interest
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ResearchEd in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Science in the Public Interest in 2025.

Incident History — ResearchEd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ResearchEd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Science in the Public Interest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Science in the Public Interest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/researched.jpeg
ResearchEd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-science-in-the-public-interest.jpeg
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Science in the Public Interest company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ResearchEd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Science in the Public Interest company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ResearchEd company.

In the current year, Center for Science in the Public Interest company and ResearchEd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest company nor ResearchEd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest company nor ResearchEd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Science in the Public Interest company nor ResearchEd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ResearchEd company nor Center for Science in the Public Interest company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ResearchEd nor Center for Science in the Public Interest holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ResearchEd company nor Center for Science in the Public Interest company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Science in the Public Interest company employs more people globally than ResearchEd company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither ResearchEd nor Center for Science in the Public Interest holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ResearchEd nor Center for Science in the Public Interest holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ResearchEd nor Center for Science in the Public Interest holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ResearchEd nor Center for Science in the Public Interest holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ResearchEd nor Center for Science in the Public Interest holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ResearchEd nor Center for Science in the Public Interest holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References