Comparison Overview

Republic of Korea Air Force

VS

Saab

Republic of Korea Air Force

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF; Korean: 대한민국 공군; Hanja: 大韓民國 空軍; Revised Romanization: Daehanminguk Gong-gun), also known as the ROK Air Force, is the aerial warfare service branch of South Korea, operating under the South Korean Ministry of National Defense. The ROKAF has about 450 combat aircraft of American design, in addition to a few Russian, European, and indigenously-designed aircraft.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Saab

Olof Palmes gata 17, Stockholm, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

As a leading defence and security company, we offer solutions that range from the depths of the oceans to high in the sky, on land and in cyberspace, to keep people and society safe. Empowered by our 22,000 talented people, we constantly push the boundaries of technology to create a safer, more sustainable and more equitable world. We design, manufacture and maintain advanced systems in aeronautics, weapons, command and control, sensors and underwater systems. We are headquartered in Sweden and have major operations all over the world and are part of the domestic defence capability of several nations.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 19,309
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/republic-of-korea-air-force.jpeg
Republic of Korea Air Force
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saab.jpeg
Saab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Republic of Korea Air Force
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Saab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Republic of Korea Air Force in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saab in 2025.

Incident History — Republic of Korea Air Force (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Republic of Korea Air Force cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Saab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/republic-of-korea-air-force.jpeg
Republic of Korea Air Force
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saab.jpeg
Saab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Saab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Republic of Korea Air Force company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Saab company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Republic of Korea Air Force company.

In the current year, Saab company and Republic of Korea Air Force company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Saab company nor Republic of Korea Air Force company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Saab company nor Republic of Korea Air Force company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Saab company nor Republic of Korea Air Force company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force company nor Saab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force nor Saab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Saab company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Republic of Korea Air Force company.

Saab company employs more people globally than Republic of Korea Air Force company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force nor Saab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force nor Saab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force nor Saab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force nor Saab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force nor Saab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Republic of Korea Air Force nor Saab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N