Comparison Overview

Reprodux

VS

CCL Design

Reprodux

1120 Brevik Pl, Mississauga, Ontario, L4W, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Born in blueprints, evolving ever since. At 60 years young, we are a passionate team dedicated to executing your vision and projects. It’s known that visual communications play a critical role at your facility – and Reprodux is here to help with print, signs, displays and graphics! We’re currently working with Airports, Arenas, Office Buildings, Retailers, and others to implement visually transformative experiences. Here’s a quick sampling of our product offering mix: Wall Murals – Fabric Prints & SEG Frames - Braille & Tactile – Wayfinding & Directional Signs – Window Decals & Coverings – Custom Wallpaper – LED Lit Signs – Channel Lettering – Popup Displays & Media Walls – Construction Site Hoarding Graphics & Signs - and so much more! Plus, ask us about: Document Scanning and Archiving Truesite.ca – our 3D scanning and site verification company

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CCL Design

4 Redwood Crescent, Global, Reach, G75 5PA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

CCL Design is a longstanding manufacturer of UL labels, printed electronics, precision die-cuts, brand security applications, branding solutions and functional materials. As part of CCL Industries, the company is headquartered in the UK, with global operations in Asia, Europe and the Americas. With a fully integrated Materials Science group, CCL Design develops in-house materials and custom solutions for some of the biggest names in the electronics, automotive and industrial sectors. Its design centres and manufacturing sites are equipped with the very latest technology, and are operated according to strict security protocols.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1,022
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reprodux.jpeg
Reprodux
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ccldesignuk.jpeg
CCL Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reprodux
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CCL Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reprodux in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CCL Design in 2025.

Incident History — Reprodux (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reprodux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CCL Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CCL Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reprodux.jpeg
Reprodux
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ccldesignuk.jpeg
CCL Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CCL Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reprodux company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CCL Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reprodux company.

In the current year, CCL Design company and Reprodux company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CCL Design company nor Reprodux company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CCL Design company nor Reprodux company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CCL Design company nor Reprodux company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reprodux company nor CCL Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reprodux nor CCL Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reprodux company nor CCL Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CCL Design company employs more people globally than Reprodux company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Reprodux nor CCL Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reprodux nor CCL Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reprodux nor CCL Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reprodux nor CCL Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reprodux nor CCL Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reprodux nor CCL Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N