Comparison Overview

Reply

VS

inDrive

Reply

C.so Francia, 110, Turin, 10143, IT
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Reply [EXM, STAR: REY] specialises in the design and implementation of solutions based on new communication channels and digital media. As a network of highly specialised companies, Reply defines and develops business models enabled by the new models of AI, big data, cloud computing, digital media and the internet of things. Reply delivers consulting, system integration and digital services to organisations across the telecom and media; industry and services; banking and insurance; and public sectors.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,816
Subsidiaries: 117
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

inDrive

Mountain View, 94040, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25

inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 400 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of urban services, including intercity transportation and delivery. In 2023, inDrive launched New Ventures, a venture and M&A arm. inDrive operates in 1065 cities in 48 countries. Driven by its mission of challenging social injustice, the company is committed to having a positive impact on the lives of one billion people by 2030. It pursues this goal both through its core business, which supports local communities via a fair pricing model; and through the work of inVision, its non-profit arm. inVision’s community empowerment programs help to advance education, sports, arts and sciences, gender equality and other vital initiatives. For more information visit www.inDrive.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,583
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reply.jpeg
Reply
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reply
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
inDrive
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reply in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2026.

Incident History — Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reply.jpeg
Reply
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indrive.jpeg
inDrive
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

inDrive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reply company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, inDrive company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reply company.

In the current year, inDrive company and Reply company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither inDrive company nor Reply company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither inDrive company nor Reply company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither inDrive company nor Reply company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reply company nor inDrive company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reply nor inDrive holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Reply company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to inDrive company.

Reply company employs more people globally than inDrive company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Reply nor inDrive holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reply nor inDrive holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reply nor inDrive holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reply nor inDrive holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reply nor inDrive holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reply nor inDrive holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N