Comparison Overview

Reotemp Instruments

VS

Emmepi Group

Reotemp Instruments

10656 Roselle Street, San Diego, California, 92121, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Reotemp is a globally recognized manufacturer of temperature and pressure instrumentation. We manufacture bimetal thermometers, pressure gauges, diaphragm seals, RTDs, thermocouples, pressure transmitters, valves, flushing rings, thermowells, and related accessories to a variety of process markets worldwide. With manufacturing locations in both San Diego, CA and Houston, TX, Reotemp services the industrial markets in North America quicker and easier than anyone else in the industry. Our reputation is built on high quality products, quick standard lead times, and exceptional customer support. We're dedicated to providing our customers with complete satisfaction, from the first phone call to the design and quality of the instrument they receive. Reotemp provides both standard and application specific products and is ready and willing to find a solution to all of your temperature and pressure needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Emmepi Group

Via della Ghisa, 1, None, Perugia, Umbria, IT, 06134
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Emmepi Group offers to the cardboard industry an advanced system for the handling, strapping, wrapping and peripherals of the corrugated cardboard. With 4 production divisions located in Perugia, Cesena, Milan and Treviso, the group is able to produce automated handling and centering systems, rotating roller conveyors, prefeeders, palletizers, robots for folder-gluer lines, stackers with vacuum conveyors, pallet inserters, a wide range of wrapping machines and ancillary equipment for corrugators and case-makers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reotemp-instruments.jpeg
Reotemp Instruments
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmepi-group.jpeg
Emmepi Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reotemp Instruments
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Emmepi Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reotemp Instruments in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emmepi Group in 2025.

Incident History — Reotemp Instruments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reotemp Instruments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Emmepi Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emmepi Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reotemp-instruments.jpeg
Reotemp Instruments
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emmepi-group.jpeg
Emmepi Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reotemp Instruments company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Emmepi Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Emmepi Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reotemp Instruments company.

In the current year, Emmepi Group company and Reotemp Instruments company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Emmepi Group company nor Reotemp Instruments company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Emmepi Group company nor Reotemp Instruments company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Emmepi Group company nor Reotemp Instruments company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reotemp Instruments company nor Emmepi Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reotemp Instruments nor Emmepi Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Reotemp Instruments company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Emmepi Group company.

Reotemp Instruments company employs more people globally than Emmepi Group company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Reotemp Instruments nor Emmepi Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reotemp Instruments nor Emmepi Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reotemp Instruments nor Emmepi Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reotemp Instruments nor Emmepi Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reotemp Instruments nor Emmepi Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reotemp Instruments nor Emmepi Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H