Comparison Overview

Rentokil Terminix

VS

Fosun 复星

Rentokil Terminix

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Rentokil and Terminix family of brands have come together to form the world’s leading pest control company. With our shared vision, we’ll be expanding our products, services, and technology. And with our combined resources, we’ll do more to power innovation and develop sustainable solutions for our planet. It’s all part of our commitment to putting you first and delivering the highest level of comfort and peace of mind to families, businesses and local communities around the corner and around the globe. This page is intended for corporate updates. To see brand specific content, visit our affiliated pages.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 12,593
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Fosun 复星

600, ZHONGSHAN NO.2 ROAD(E) SHANGHAI, 200010 PRC, Shanghai, 200010, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Fosun was founded in 1992. After more than 30 years of development, Fosun has become a global innovation-driven consumer group. Adhering to the mission of creating happier lives for families worldwide, Fosun is committed to creating a global happiness ecosystem fulfilling the needs for families in health, happiness, and wealth. In 2007, Fosun International Limited was listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX stock code: 00656). As of 31 December 2024, Fosun International's total assets amounted to RMB796.5 billion and it received an AA MSCI ESG rating.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 17,203
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rentokilterminix.jpeg
Rentokil Terminix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rentokil Terminix
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fosun 复星
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rentokil Terminix in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fosun 复星 in 2025.

Incident History — Rentokil Terminix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rentokil Terminix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fosun 复星 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fosun 复星 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rentokilterminix.jpeg
Rentokil Terminix
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fosun 复星 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rentokil Terminix company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rentokil Terminix company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Fosun 复星 company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fosun 复星 company and Rentokil Terminix company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Rentokil Terminix company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Rentokil Terminix company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Fosun 复星 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Rentokil Terminix company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rentokil Terminix company nor Fosun 复星 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Fosun 复星 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fosun 复星 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rentokil Terminix company.

Fosun 复星 company employs more people globally than Rentokil Terminix company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Fosun 复星 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Fosun 复星 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Fosun 复星 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Fosun 复星 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Fosun 复星 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Fosun 复星 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H