Comparison Overview

Renown Engineering Ltd

VS

Security Locknut

Renown Engineering Ltd

Northumberland Business Park West, Cramlington, NE23 7RH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Renown Engineering Ltd is a centre of engineering excellence providing design, manufacturing, assembly and refurbishment services of precision engineered products. For more than 25 years, Renown Engineering has been a trusted supplier to industries including defence, marine, oil and gas. Renown Engineering excels in precision machining, design, repairs, armour welding, fabrication, painting, assembly and test of complex products. As a result of strategic investment and ongoing investment, Renown Engineering continues to operate at the forefront of engineering innovation. Renown Engineering is part of the Renown Group within the Defence and Specialist Engineering Division.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Security Locknut

999 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL, 60026, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Ours work. It's that simple. Security Locknut delivers where others have failed. We’re the ones with the answer, the team that has designed safe, durable, cost-effective locknuts for the most demanding bolted-joint applications. We know that every situation is unique so we work in close collaboration with our clients to identify their specific needs and provide the most effective solution. Contact us and find out why.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/renown-engineering-ltd.jpeg
Renown Engineering Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/security-locknut-llc.jpeg
Security Locknut
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Renown Engineering Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Security Locknut
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Renown Engineering Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Security Locknut in 2025.

Incident History — Renown Engineering Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Renown Engineering Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Security Locknut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Security Locknut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/renown-engineering-ltd.jpeg
Renown Engineering Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/security-locknut-llc.jpeg
Security Locknut
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Renown Engineering Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Security Locknut company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Security Locknut company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Renown Engineering Ltd company.

In the current year, Security Locknut company and Renown Engineering Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Security Locknut company nor Renown Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Security Locknut company nor Renown Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Security Locknut company nor Renown Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd company nor Security Locknut company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd nor Security Locknut holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd company nor Security Locknut company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Renown Engineering Ltd company employs more people globally than Security Locknut company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd nor Security Locknut holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd nor Security Locknut holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd nor Security Locknut holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd nor Security Locknut holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd nor Security Locknut holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Renown Engineering Ltd nor Security Locknut holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H