Comparison Overview

Rencol Components Ltd.

VS

SKF Group

Rencol Components Ltd.

Unit 2, Avonbridge Trading Estate, Bristol, BS11 9QD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Following 100 years of successful design and manufacturing experience in plastic and metals, Rencol Components has built a truly global supply chain - rapidly expanding our range of high-quality, competitively-priced industrial components. Rencol has developed a mature and efficient Supply Chain with English-speaking personnel specialising in design, engineering, quality and logistics. Our permanent quality and engineering personnel work closely with all manufacturing facilities. We leverage the latest advances in communications and information technology to integrate our Component Sourcing, Management, and Sales & Product Development teams in Shanghai (China), New York (USA), and Bristol (UK), respectively. Specialties: Custom manufacturing, plastic injection moulding, die casting, forging, machining, metal stamping, tooling and sub assemblies. Far East product sourcing, China manufacturing facilities. Global supply chain network.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 11,559
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SKF Group

Sven Wingquist Gata 2, Göteborg, Sweden, SE-415 50, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

What started with the invention of the self-aligning bearing in 1907 has now evolved into something much more! Our products enable rotation. Machinery, cars, airplane engines, even household products - anywhere there are parts that rotate, our solutions can be found! As the world moves swiftly into an age of digitalization, so are we. With sensorized bearings, condition monitoring, and connected factories - SKF offers exciting opportunities and challenges - whatever your area of expertise. If you are looking for an interesting career at SKF, visit our career page. For our Social media House rules please visit: https://www.skf.com/group/organisation/about-skf/social-media-house-rules.html

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 18,939
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rencol-components-ltd.jpeg
Rencol Components Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skf.jpeg
SKF Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rencol Components Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SKF Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rencol Components Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SKF Group in 2025.

Incident History — Rencol Components Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rencol Components Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SKF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SKF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rencol-components-ltd.jpeg
Rencol Components Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/skf.jpeg
SKF Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rencol Components Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SKF Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SKF Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rencol Components Ltd. company.

In the current year, SKF Group company and Rencol Components Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SKF Group company nor Rencol Components Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SKF Group company nor Rencol Components Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SKF Group company nor Rencol Components Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. company nor SKF Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. nor SKF Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SKF Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rencol Components Ltd. company.

SKF Group company employs more people globally than Rencol Components Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. nor SKF Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. nor SKF Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. nor SKF Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. nor SKF Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. nor SKF Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. nor SKF Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H