Comparison Overview

Remote Control, Inc.

VS

Applied Automation Systems Private Limited

Remote Control, Inc.

77 Circuit Drive, North Kingstown, RI, 02852, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Remote Control Inc. specializes in engineered valve control systems. Since 1988 we have provided solutions to match a vast array of valve and process requirements. Our timely quoting and reliable deliveries, combined with consistently providing the right solution, means you can confidently select Remote Control as your actuator and accessory supplier.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Applied Automation Systems Private Limited

SF NO 415 Codissia Road, Opp.Geethanjali School,Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN, 641004
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Applied Automation Systems Private Limited With the primary focus to provide quality process automation systems for the textile spinning industry came the inception of Applied Automation in the year 1994. Applied has established itself since then as a solution provider to the industry in areas of PLC PC-based controls systems for Process Control and Monitoring. Applied has also become a OEM supplier in this area for a few Machine builders by developing solutions for machine controls and monitoring applications. Since 2005 Applied has been executing projects for the overseas utility companies in the Oil and gas industry with more than a dozen projects completed to customer satisfaction in this area. Applied’s industry expertise of providing quality solutions has resulted in a trusted client base of over 400 companies. Applied is currently generating revenues based on repeat business, besides the growing market for our process automation systems. Applied has a specialized presence by way of providing solutions in industries like *Textile Machinery, Spinning, Weaving, Dying Industries *Medical Laboratories *Oil and Gas Utility Distribution Industries *Oil reprocessing Machinery Automation and Control Systems *Paper Manufacturing *Power and Distribution

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remote-control-inc-.jpeg
Remote Control, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-automation-systems-pvt-ltd.jpeg
Applied Automation Systems Private Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Remote Control, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Applied Automation Systems Private Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Remote Control, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Automation Systems Private Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Remote Control, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Remote Control, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Applied Automation Systems Private Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Automation Systems Private Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remote-control-inc-.jpeg
Remote Control, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-automation-systems-pvt-ltd.jpeg
Applied Automation Systems Private Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Remote Control, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Remote Control, Inc. company.

In the current year, Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company and Remote Control, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company nor Remote Control, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company nor Remote Control, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company nor Remote Control, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. company nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. company nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Applied Automation Systems Private Limited company employs more people globally than Remote Control, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Remote Control, Inc. nor Applied Automation Systems Private Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H